Saturday, March 10, 2012

Slain terror chief had publicly acknowledged his link to Shalit affair

THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
In interviews after the soldier was freed last year, Zuhair al-Qaissi gave details of Shalit’s interrogation and treatment
 March 9, 2012, 11:10 pm


Recently-freed Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit (photo credit: Jack Guez/POO/Flash90)
Recently-freed Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit (photo credit: Jack Guez/POO/Flash90)



Z
Popular Resistance Committee head Zuhair al-Qaissi was killed in an Israeli airstrike on Friday. (photo credit: IDF spokesperson)uhair al-Qaissi, the Gaza terror chief blown up in his car in an Israeli strike on Friday, publicly acknowledged his link to the Shalit affair in the days after Gilad Shalit was freed in a lopsided prisoner exchange last October.
Speaking to the newspaper Al-Hayat immediately after Shalit had been released, al-Qaissi, the head of the Hamas-linked Popular Resistance Committees, detailed the messages that had been received from the day of Shalit’s kidnapping — messages sent via Arab government officials, from Israel — making all sorts of offers and promises if Shalit were released. “We refused to respond to these threats,” he said.
He gave details of the initial interrogation of Shalit by his colleagues in the PRC. He named those colleagues as Imad Hamad, who he said abducted Shalit and who was later killed by Israel, and previous PRC chief Kamal A-Nirev.
“Shalit was very suspicious, but he responded clearly to the questions during the first hours that he was held by the military arm of the Popular Committees,” said Al-Qaissi.
He also said Shalit was given over to Hamas, because only Hamas “had the capabilities and the locations which allowed them to keep the prisoner in a safe secret place.”
“He had access to radio and television. We took care of him, his physical and mental health. He was not given over to any emotional or physical torture. He was lightly injured in the course of his capture, and he received the necessary medical care and completely healed,” al-Qaissi said.
Gilad Shalit, second right, walks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, second left, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, left, and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz, right, at the Tel Nof Air base in southern Israel, Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2011. Shalit returned home that day from more than five years of captivity in the Gaza Strip. (photo credit: Ariel Hermoni/ Defense Ministry /Flash90)
Gilad Shalit, second right, walks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, second left, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, left, and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz, right, at the Tel Nof Air base in southern Israel, Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2011. Shalit returned home that day from more than five years of captivity in the Gaza Strip. (photo credit: Ariel Hermoni/ Defense Ministry /Flash90)
In a second interview with the Associated Press in Gaza City a few days later, on October 23, al-Qaissi claimed that Shalit, who was held for more than five years, was treated well, given sufficient food and allowed to watch Hebrew-language TV.
Shalit was provided food that “fits him as a Jew,” said al-Qaissi. “The way Shalit looked when he was released proved that he was treated well,” he said.
The assertion was immediately countered by Shalit’s father Noam, who said his son had “endured harsh things.” Gilad, added Noam, was suffering from malnutrition, the effects of isolation and lack of exposure to sun, and also wounds sustained during his capture that had not been allowed to heal.
Noam said claims that his son was not tortured during his time in Hamas captivity should be taken “with a grain of salt.”
“Gilad went through harsh things, at least in the first period (that he was held.” After that, Noam added, “the way he was treated improved.”





Israel Strikes Terrorists Planning Major Terrorist Attack

Challah Hu Akbar


Earlier today, terrorists in Gaza fired two rockets into Israel. On Thursday, one mortar was fired. As of Friday morning, in March, at least 11 rockets had been fired from Gaza into Israel.
In a preemptive strike against terrorists planning a major terrorist attack, the IDF carried out atargeted assassination, which killed Secretary General of the Popular Resistance Committees, Zuhir al-Qaisi, as well as senior Popular Resistance Committees member, Ahmed Hanani, who was reportedly released in the recent Shalit deal. (I have now confirmed that Hanani was not part of the Shalit deal, but was released four years ago.) 
The Popular Resistance Committees has said that they will respond to the strike with a “seismic response.” According to PalTimes, several Palestinian factions have announced that they are ending their truce with Israel in response to the attack.


Obama's Political Expediency Is Hurting Our Nation

March 9, 2012

AMERICAN THINKER

By Lauri B. Regan
As a candidate, Barack Obama's devious political machinations were one of his many character flaws available for public scrutiny yet continuously ignored For instance, he spoke at the AIPAC Policy Conference in 2008 at which he promised the over 10,000 Jewish attendees and the Jewish people who were listening in across the world that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel and it must remain undivided."  The next day, in response to Muslim outrage, he completely changed his tune, explaining that the word "undivided" was "poorly chosen."  One would expect when it comes to a speech from the man who understands that his words lead to "folks faint[ing] all the time at [his] events," that man would choose those words wisely, but Obama the neophyte was given a pass.
Yet Obama, having been well-trained in oratory and community organizing, was no neophyte.  That is why, while still a candidate, he found himself throwing long-term friends and advisors under the bus in order to ensure that his public persona would lead to the highest office in the land despite the fact that his personal story, which he would ensure be kept under wraps, was something quite inapposite.  In just two days, we have learned from Breitbart.com that in addition to the videotape of Obama at the Rashid Khalidi dinner party that the L.A. Times refuses to release, there are at least two other videotapes that are either still being hidden or were hidden from the public by Obama's supporters and allies.  The director of a play entitled The Love Song of Saul Alinsky, Pam Dickler, is reportedly sitting on a video of that play that was not only attended by Obama, but followed by his participation on stage in a panel discussion with fellow radicals.  And thanks to Breitbart, we are now privy to a videotape of Obama speaking at a rally praising friend and professor Derrick Bell, known for his extremist academic advocacy of critical race theory.  That video was proudly and admittedly hidden during the 2008 election by Obama campaign associate and Harvard Law Schoolprofessor Charles Ogletree.
Unfortunately, the political machinations did not end when Obama became president and took the oath of office to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."  Placing his hand on the Bible apparently had little meaning to a man who never evolved from candidate to leader.  And while he has certainly stepped up his actual campaigning in the past several months (he has attended more fundraisers to date [191] than any president going back to Carter), Obama has never once put the country ahead of his own political aspirations and ideology.
Here at home, Obama ran roughshod over the Constitution and rammed through ObamaCare as if it had been the most urgent piece of legislation to ever come before Congress.  But Obama is no moron, and he and his Democrat co-conspirators ensured that its provisions (and massively detrimental implications for the country and economy) would not kick in until after the 2012 election.  Thus, as Pelosi announced that "we have to pass the bill in order to find out what is in it," Obama hoped that no one would actually find out about the increased costs, decreased choices, and onerous and right-infringing regulations until after he had won re-election.  In that regard, he thankfully failed.
More recently, Obama called the Republicans' bluff and refused to endorse the Keystone XL Pipeline despite the fact that it would almost instantaneously create 20,000 new jobs and ultimately lead to lower energy costs.  Obama calculated that the costs of losing the support of the greenies (and the money that flows from the rich left-wing environmental extremists) would outweigh the negative effects of the GOP spin on the issue.  And with the media in his pocket, perhaps he got that one right since the spin in the mainstream portrayed the entire event as a failed ploy by Republicans.
As the civilized world looked to U.S. leadership to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, Obama (pretending to be the strongest implementer of sanctions since sanctions were discovered) fought tooth and nail over the past three years to water down whatever Congress or the Europeans proposed.  Thus, in December, under the guise of support for the Kirk-Menendez sanctions bill, Obama threatened a veto unless the bill delayed the implementation of the sanctions for six months.  His plan was to delay as long as possible in the hope that any effect on oil prices would not impair his chances of re-election.
Which leads to Obama's decisions on the international stage that have been made solely based on their ability to ensure another four years of golf, vacations, private jets, servants, and most importantly, the implementation of further socialist policies and trashing of the Constitution.  While candidate Obama promised to withdraw our troops from Iraq, one would have expected that a President Obama would have realized that in order to ensure long-term stability and viability of the young democracy that was being eyed by Iran, some sort of U.S. military presence was owed not only to the Iraqi people, but also to the members of the military who fought in Iraq and risked their lives, suffered injury, or lost their lives with purpose in their hearts.  Obama calculated that following through with the promise that the Bush administration had made to bring freedom to the Iraqi people was not worth the backlash that he would feel from his far-left base, and he threw the Iraqi people under the bus.
Similarly, Obama stood before the world and simultaneously announced a surge in U.S. troops fighting the war in Afghanistan while declaring a drop-dead date on which he would withdraw our military in full, all with an eye to November 2012.  What kind of commander-in-chief sends his soldiers into battle while giving the enemy notice to make plans for the date that the latter can retake control?  Only a man who cares about himself with nary a care in the world for the lives of his countrymen would do so.  Just as he did when he gave away top secret military intelligence after the killing of Osama bin Laden that led to the death of many of the Navy SEALs who completed that operation when their helicopter was shot down.
And while the list is endless, the most recent and disgustingly egregious political maneuver by the POTUS occurred this week when we learned that Obama attempted to bribe the Israeli prime minister with advanced weaponry needed to bolster the chances of Israel's success in a strike on Iran.  In his meeting with Netanyahu, Obama offered to supply Israel with military equipment including bunker-busting bombs and refueling planes if Netanyahu would agree to hold off on attacking Iran...until 2013.  The president of the United States has taken this country to a new low.  He has officially thrown Israel under the bus; for we all know, if Obama wins a second term, during which he will no longer need the money and votes of the American people, he will turn on Israel definitively without reproach.  And he will let Iran go nuclear.
Anyone old enough to remember the Bush/Kerry fight will recall the images of Bush supporters waving large flip-flops and joking about Kerry's lack of soul in making decisions.  Romney is hearing that now from the left, as his positions over the years have been refined and he has matured.  Barack Obama is a different animal altogether.  He is flip-flopping not for political expediency or due to maturity.  He is consistently single-mindedly leading the country down a very scary path of disrespect on the world stage and vulnerability here at home for political gain.  He has given no indication that he cares about anything other than race-baiting, class warfare, and crony capitalism pursuant to which he takes care of his personal allies rather than America's allies, and all of which he has used as tools to ensure four more years of failed leadership.  If anyone thinks things are going to change in a second term, I've got a Bridge to Nowhere to sell.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/03/obamas_political_expediency_is_hurting_our_nation.html#ixzz1oglakiuV

Friday Afternoon Roundup - Over the Cliff We Go - by Sultan Knish

Friday, March 9, 2012



THE ELECTRIC DC CAR TEST

It seems as if the Obama Administration will mainly be remembered for two things. Turning over the entire Middle East to the Muslim Brotherhood and badly mishandling the automotive industry.

Controlling what cars people own and how they work is a basic means of social control. Trying to seize control of the industry was a golden opportunity for the nudgers to nudge us into our corner. But the post-bailout GM is acting like the pre-bailout GM, senselessly buying up pieces of foreign car companies that it doesn't actually need, but this time it's doing it in the name of the sustainable energy mantra.

Corporate buying sprees are usually about two things, an incompetent CEO trying to outrace failure with a spurt of activity that convinces the shareholders that he might really be a visionary by picking up companies which are a bad fit (see AOL/Time Warner or AOL/Huffington Post) and they're about a company that can't move its product trying to monopolize the marketplace figuring that people will have to buy its products if it owns a piece of all the manufacturers. All it really does is pile up massive amounts of debt.

This is the same model used by Obama in his expansion of the government, which just goes to show you that the critics who think he couldn't make it in the business world are wrong. He could run GM and he has run GM. And what's bad for GM is bad for America and what's bad for America is bad for GM.

Meanwhile the subsidized electric car industry isn't running too well either. The Volt's problems are well known. This week the Karma had a well publicized Consumer Reports blowout. It joins a long list of stimulus funds recipient electric car companies and battery manufacturers that have failed.

The Fisker Karma is an apt metaphor for the Obama Administration. It's hideously expensive, heavily hyped and doesn't work. 

The problem here isn't the technology. Given time, patience and investors, the technological problems can be licked. But a free market variation of Soviet central planning is going to produce only marginally better results.

The stimulus was used to drive a command economy where the products that the government wanted to see made, got made. And that was doomed from the start.

The government can get things done by throwing enough money and manpower at it. That is how we got to the moon. It will however do so inefficiently with huge cost overruns and major problems. The technology will not be mature, there will be serious unexpected problems and the process will be difficult to sustain over the long run.

Product development is a process that requires the whole cycle of striving, testing, failure, reevaluation and eventual success that has been followed by every company trying to make a revolutionary product. Plunking a bunch of laptop batteries into a car, rolling out a snazzy marketing campaign and taking in stimulus money does not lead to a working electric car that everyone will want. It leads to publicized failure. 

We're not going to get an electric car by throwing a bunch of money at electric car companies. We're not going to get one by hiking the price of gasoline and then throwing in more tax breaks to electric car buyers. All this social and economic control does not create a working product.

If we are going to have a popular and affordable electric car that works well, it is not going to come from stimulus funds. It will follow the old Ford path, it will be revolutionary because it has met the challenges of the marketplace. Not because it has a sugar daddy in D.C. 


WARMONGERING

Following the official vocabulary of our approved class, talk about a genocidal state developing nuclear weapons is 'warmongering'. But Friends of Syria and Kony2012 are positively humanitarian. Iraq was warmongering, but Libya was humanitarian.

When liberals want to bomb places or kill people, it's always humanitarian and never warmongering. It's never even a war. But mention Israel and Iran, and unlike the chummy Friends of Syria and Kony2012, you're a... warmonger.


END OF THE LINE

Nearly twenty years ago when the South Korean president arrived in Washington, President Clinton treated him to nearly the same remarks that Obama just offered Netanyahu, complete with all the right noises about “America’s unyielding commitment to South Korea’s security” and making it clear to North Korea that it faces international isolation and the wrath of the international community if it should go on with its nuclear program.

Netanyahu has no interest in seeing the same “firm resolve” for achieving a diplomatic solution that was applied to North Korea allow Iran to become a nuclear power. That was something he emphasized in both his speech to AIPAC and in his remarks to Obama. And that is the ultimate bottom line.

The only thing riding on this for Obama is his election if some Jews in Florida go rogue in a close race. But for Netanyahu, who has lost elections before, this is about being on the front lines of a nuclear war. Netanyahu is a politician, with all the flaws of the breed, but he also sees the abyss and unlike Obama, he is capable of putting country first.

....you can see my entire article, At the Poker Table with Bibi and Barack at Front Page



WE'VE GOT YOUR BACK

And as I’ve said to the Prime Minister in every single one of our meetings, the United States will always have Israel’s back...

But just like his election AIPAC speech included support for a united Jerusalem that got quickly walked back and so we quickly switched to...

 “not a military doctrine that we were laying out for any particular military action. . . . It was a restatement of our consistent position that the security of Israel is something I deeply care about . . . [and] confirms how deeply we care about it."

So it was a statement of caring deeply about how Obama cares deeply about the things that he cares deeply about. And then came...

President Obama on Tuesday rebuked Republicans on the presidential campaign trail and in Congress for "beating the drums of war" in criticizing his efforts to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis over Iran's nuclear program.

Oddly he doesn't seem nearly as invested in finding a diplomatic solution with Assad or Kony, but some war drums should be beaten and some shouldn't. But his diplomacy got the stamp of approval from no lesser figure than the Supreme Leader.

Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Thursday praised US President Barack Obama for recent remarks in which he warned against "beating the drums of war."

No doubt about it. O has got Iran's back.



GOOD MUSLIM BITCHES

The media is officially in mourning for the cancellation of All-American Muslim, a show no one watched, but which was praised for showing Muslims in a positive light. That same media is also sneering at Christians for objecting to the new ABC show, Good Christian Bitches.

Can anyone imagine a media landscape where a show like Good Muslim Bitches ever got aired or where the idea would get to stage 1. It wouldn't happen.

Just like if you put up posters attacking Christianity or Judaism in your window, you would be a bold social critic. But do it for Islam and you get a  12 month jail sentence. Not in Pakistan, but in the UK.

We aren't told what the content was, as in medieval blasphemy trials or the justice system of the Muslim world, it's too blasphemous for us to see. We must take the court's word for it. According to one media outlet, "Many were offensive – attacking both the prophet Mohammed and the Muslim religion."

There was a time when you read that sort of thing coming out of a Saudi trial and you shook your head at the absurdity of this still going on in the modern world. But no longer. Now we can enjoy Sharia even in the West.

"Later that day police attended the premises and found 17 posters and images in the front window in full public view. The majority of the displayed posters and images were undoubtedly offensive to the Islamic faith. Conway was arrested at the scene and taken into police custody."

Just think of it... in full public view. Where anyone could see his hideously offensive blasphemy. Why bother reading 1984 when we're already living it?

But if Darren Conway had only headed to Hollywood and directed his talents toward attacking other religions, he could have his own TV show on ABC or an art exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art.


THE JIHAD VS THE NYPD

The NYPD has 1200 men and an annual budget of 330 million dollars focused on defeating terrorists. While the Obama era FBI has put a greater focus on “corporate fraud,” “financial institution fraud” and “health care fraud,” infiltrating “online pharmacies“ and “nursing homes,” the NYPD is still vigilant because it’s their city.

Nor can the NYPD confine itself to the five boroughs. The September 11 hijackers were outside NYPD jurisdiction until they entered New York airspace. The World Trade Center bombers came out of Jersey City. Local is good enough for small scale terrorist attacks, but the first sign of a large scale terrorist attack orchestrated out of Boston or across the river in New Jersey may be the rising flames and smoke over a New York landmark.

In Trenton, New Jersey’s Attorney General met with Muslim leaders demanding action, including the local chair of CAIR, an organization that remains an unindicted terrorist conspirator. In Chicago, Newark’s former police director, met with Muslims and promised that there would be no blanket surveillance. Back home in New York City, radical leftist mayoral candidate John Liu, whose campaign treasurer was recently charged with fraud and who appears to have been the beneficiary of a lot of donations that have come out of thin air, condemned the surveillance. He was one of the few to do so.

In New York City support for the surveillance is apolitical to a surprising extent. Mayor Bloomberg, usually a vocal advocate of Muslim causes, has been equally vocal in defending the NYPD. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, so far to the left that he all but promised Al Sharpton an office in Albany, has declined to investigate the NYPD. The likely Democratic successors to Bloomberg remained equally mum. Even in a liberal town, no one besides the Associated Press, which makes its headquarters on the West Side, places political correctness over another September 11.

... you can see my full article at Front Page Magazine



I'M OFFENDED THAT WE'VE EVEN HAVING THIS DISCUSSION

Forget about being offended by specific statements, the new hot trendy liberal thing is to be even having the discussion. Landsberg-Fluke is one example, here's another local one.

With New York’s proposed Dream Act at a near standstill in the State Legislature, advocacy groups took matters into their own hands and financed scholarships for 10 illegal immigrants... with the support of the Fund for Public Advocacy, a nonprofit arm of the office of the city’s public advocate, Bill de Blasio.

The New York program was announced at a news conference, where Mr. De Blasio, a likely contender for mayor, decried the need for private groups to fill in the gaps in aid to students who are in the United States illegally. “We all have to make up for the madness of our national policies,” he said. “As an American and the grandson of immigrants, I’m offended we even have to be standing here having this discussion.”

To recap the madness of De Blasio, a radical leftist, he's offended that we're even having a discussion about whether the government should provide scholarships to illegal aliens.

He's not offended that it's being denied, he's offended that the question is even being raised.He's offended that "private groups" have to provide free scholarships, instead of the government providing them at taxpayer expense, to people who have no right to be in the country.

Furthermore it's hardly at private expense as the Public Advocate is an elected city office, De Blasio draws a salary paid for by taxpayers. And don't get the idea that these are educational scholarships, this is community organizer training.

The Dream Fellowships have as their goal

To provide leadership development and training for Dream Act students through internships with community organizations that advocate for immigrant rights;

To provide social justice organizations with talented and capable immigrant student activists;

To provide scholarships for immigrant students to pursue their educational goals, and to advance social justice activism among immigrant youth in New York City.

Oddly there was a time when major urban politicians didn't talk like they wanted to be Che or draw their mission vocabulary from Soviet propaganda. There was also a time when they could be disagreed with without offending them by even having this discussion.


VICTORY IN AFGHANISTAN AT LAST...

...for the Taliban.

President Hamid Karzai‘s Tuesday remarks backing the Ulema Council's document, which allows husbands to beat wives under certain circumstances and encourages segregation of the sexes, is seen as part of his outreach to insurgents like the Taliban.

Among the rules: Women should not travel without a male guardian and women should not mingle with strange men in places like schools, markets or offices. Beating one's wife is prohibited only if there is no "Shariah-compliant reason," it said, referring to the principles of Islamic law.

Asked about the code of conduct at a press conference in the capital, Karzai said it was in line with Islamic law and was written in consultation with Afghan women's groups.

"The clerics' council of Afghanistan did not put any limitations on women," Karzai said, adding: "It is the Shariah law of all Muslims and all Afghans."

...and it is. How can you argue with Shariah?

The edict went on to say that women would wear "full Islamic hijab", should respect polygamy — Islam allows a man to take up to four wives — and comply with Shariah law on divorce, which severely restricts women's rights.

As we all know Islam is progressive and human rights oriented. It's the only feminist religion known to man. We also know that much of the Taliban is secretly moderate and just waiting to rush in and join the moderate Karzai regime. So Obama hath said and so it must be.

Some Islamophobic Afghani women appear to be concerned about this, but there is no reason to be. Sharia is just wonderful and soon we'll be able to enjoy it locally.

Even this edict's coverage is being widely distorted. Here's an underreported aspect of it.

 Last Friday, the Council, Afghanistan's highest Islamic authority, issued a non-binding edict saying that women were worth less than men — a statement released by Karzai's office and then endorsed by the president on Tuesday.

"Men are fundamental and women are secondary," it said, adding women should avoid "mingling with strange men in various social activities such as education, in bazaars, in offices and other aspects of life".

Read this twice and you'll understand everything you need to know about the Islamic attitude toward women.

This doesn't change as much as you would think. Tribal areas never stopped running this way while the elite in Kabul do what they like, as is the case throughout the Muslim world. That too will change once the Taliban are back in Kabul.

While the media plays up feel good stories about Afghan women learning to shoot hoops or box or practice martial arts, this is the reality for most of the misbegotten country. 

Sakina's eyes are dark wells of despair that lighten only briefly when the 20-year-old mother looks at her nine-month-old son, Mirwais.

Mother and child are inhabitants of the Badam Bagh women's prison in Kabul, Afghanistan. Here children born to inmates share their mothers' sentences.

"They will send me to my father's house," she says, her voice barely above a whisper as she speaks to a reporter permitted a rare glimpse inside Afghanistan's criminal justice system for women.

"He will kill me for sure. Then he will kill, or sell, my little boy, " said Sakina.

Sakina's imprisonment stems from her attempts to evade a uniquely medieval form of restitution practiced in tribal courts and known as ba'ad. It is Afghanistan's version of restorative justice in which women and girls are bartered from one family to another as a way to settle a dispute.

"In the tribal courts, the first sacrifice is women," Sirran said. "Always. If there is a fight for land, for water, if there is violence, a girl can be given in ba'ad to settle these things."

Sakina is in prison for the heinous crime of kidnapping. What makes her case a bit unusual is that the kidnapping victim was Sakina herself.

It's not unusual at all, the reporter just hasn't come up with the correct terminology. Slaves can be charged with kidnapping, because they are property. So can women under Islam.

To assuage affronts to honor, to compensate for financial loss, even to reconcile families of murderers and victims, jirgas often award a young girl to the affronted party in the practice known as "ba'ad."

The rationale is deceptively benign: uniting two families by blood is supposed to smooth over the enmity, preventing feuds that often drag on for years, even into new generations.

But the reality is quite different. A young girl who is given in ba'ad all too often becomes the scapegoat for her new family's grief and anger. They take out their rage on the helpless girl, who is usually wed to a male member of the new family, regardless of age or temperament.

In Sakina's case, the match was more than inappropriate: she was a child of five. Her "fiance" was 70.

...deceptively benign. Much like Islam.

But don't worry there are Afghani policewomen. With actual guns

So why would female police officers in the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif be ashamed to admit they wear the badge?

"Except my very close family members, no one really knows that I am a police officer," said one woman at a NATO training session.

The woman, who asked not to give her name, says she tells most of her family that she works with a foreign aid organization. That's because the rumors about sexual abuse in Mazar-e-Sharif's police force are so widespread that many of these women are ashamed to say they're cops.

She says on one occasion her house was invaded by a group of men who stayed all night, raping her in front of her small children. Ann, who is married, recognized some of them as police. She didn't report the incident for fear of public disgrace, and because she believes the police chief already knew.

A second woman in her mid-30s, Jane — also not her real name — says she was also raped by her superiors on the force after the threat of losing her job — the only income supporting her several children.

"Put it this way: If there is a young woman, and she wants to remain in her post, she accepts being used this way," said Jane.

The women say abuse is widespread across Mazar-e-Sharif's police force and that female officers are practically "trafficked" when they are transferred from one district to another.

Another woman, in her late-30s, arrived for an interview hiding her police uniform under her burqa. She says that after almost 10 years on the force, police officers stopped demanding sex from her but forced her to procure prostitutes.

"Anywhere you ask for a job in the police force, they either ask you to give yourself or bring them girls," she said. She named several policewomen who act as madams for cops in the city.

...want to rebuild Afghanistan? Try a large shovel and a big pile of dirt.




GETTING READY FOR THE RECONQUISTA

Islamic archery revived in Surrey mosque

Following the Sunnah of Muhammad, Muslims and mosques in the southern British country of Surry are reviving the centuries-old sport of horseback archery at weekly sessions which attract many young Muslims.

I suppose if the UK goes downhill enough, the clash of civs will be fought with cavalry and bowmen. The source and basis for this love of archery by Mohammed goes unmentioned as one of those things that reputable news outlets like the BBC need not be concerned with.

But here are some cheerful possibilities.

"It has been narrated on the authority of Ibn Amir who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say-and he was delivering a sermon from the pulpit: Prepare to meet them with as much strength as you can afford. Beware, strength consists in archery. Beware, strength consists in archery. Beware, strength consists in archery." (Sahih Muslim 020: 4711)

"I heard the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: Allah, Most High, will cause three persons to enter Paradise for one arrow: the maker when he has a good motive in making it, the one who shoots it, and the one who hands it; so shoot and ride, but your shooting is dearer to me than your riding. Everything with which a man amuses himself is vain except three (things): a man's training of his horse, his playing with his wife, and his shooting with his bow and arrow."  (Sahih Muslim 14:2507)

Of course we must once again mention that Islam is a Religion of Peace.

You do have to give old Mo credit for understanding the tactical importance of archery. You can't abduct and rape women, until you manage to defeat the armies of your foe. Like many rapists, Mohammed was quite methodical about the process. But he also understood that fooling infidels is even more important than archery.

There's two ways to shoot a man with a bow. In the front or in the back. Mohammed and his latter day successors always preferred the back.


ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET OBAMA

COSTELLO: Okay, so it's 16% unemployed.
ABBOTT: No, that's 9%...

COSTELLO: Wait a minute. Is it 9% or 16%?
ABBOTT: 9% are unemployed. 16% are out of work.

COSTELLO: IF you are out of work you are unemployed.
ABBOTT: No, you can't count the "Out of Work" as the unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.

COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!
ABBOTT: No, you miss my point.

COSTELLO: What point?
ABBOTT: Someone who doesn't look for work, can't be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn't be fair.

COSTELLO: To whom?
ABBOTT: The unemployed.

... see the full skit at American Digest



THE BUDGET THAT ATE AMERICA

Speaking of issues that will work against President Obama in November, this whopper of an announcement was just released:  The CBO has projected that the government deficit for February 2012 will be $229 billion, making the FY2012 deficit already more than half a trillion dollars. This is the highest monthly budget deficit in history....

Give Obama a chance, he can do better. By next month it can be 300 billion.


THE ROUNDUP

...the joy of helping people at gunpoint... is that you can celebrate your own oppression as moral. You're not being oppressed, you're being elevated by your moral superiors.

Lost toys, lost boys and lost childhoods.

Power through, and fight on.

Muslim have always been part of our history. Really.

Occupy the Money

Who would have thought, three or four decades ago, that Communist activists and terrorists such as Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Van Jones, Anita Dunn, David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, Tom Haydn, Jane Fonda, and a gallery of other protégés, associates, appointees, and fellow travelers would become the social and political elite to formulate, determine and oversee domestic and foreign policies of the United States?

Obama's kosher baloney

About that poll you're seeing hyped everywhere which claims Israelis oppose action on Iran. It has as much credibility as its pollsters

Shibley Telhami is a Brookings fellow, a liberal think tank with major cash infusions from bigwig dem donor Saban. Worse still this poll comes from the Dahaf Institute, with a list of polls that has Israelis backing Obama and the left on everything.

In 2009, they claimed the majority of Israelis "Support Obama's Settlement Policy" and that they were backing the Geneva Initiative. Another Dahaf poll claimed that Israelis support Obama over Republican candidates. The polls are a load of crap to put it politely, they clash with actual legitimate polls and the fake 19 percent number is now being hyped by a media which does nothing but repeat the talking points of Obama and his backers.