Thursday, May 9, 2013

SEAL Mom: “This is Submission and the Cost of that Submission on August 6 was My Only Son”


karen vaughn

I’ve said before that the Rules of Engagement are a much bigger scandal than Benghazi. I don’t have much else to say, except watch this video. Find an Obama supporter who still has some sense of right and wrong and show them this video.

The hearts and minds of the enemy are more valuable to this government than...


About 
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


FAMILIES OF SLAIN SEAL TEAM 6 MEMBERS ARE MAKING SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT (Videos)


FAMILIES OF SLAIN SEAL TEAM 6 MEMBERS ARE MAKING SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT

 

Three families of Navy SEAL Team VI Special Forces servicemen and another family of an Army National Guardsman are scheduled to appear at a press conference on Thursday to “disclose never before revealed information about how and why their sons along with 26 others died in a fatal helicopter crash in Afghanistan,” according to a press release issued by the families.
The helicopter, carrying 25 members of SEAL Team VI and five other Americans, crashed in August of 2011 after it was reportedly shot down by insurgents. A total of 38 people died including seven Afghans and an interpreter. The tragic incident occurred just a few months after the successful raid on the compound of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan.
The families will reportedly be joined by retired military experts to explain “how and why the government is as much responsible for the deaths of their sons as the Taliban,” the release adds.
More from the press release obtained by The Blaze:
The areas of inquiry at the press conference will include but not be limited to:
How President Obama and Vice President Biden, having disclosed on May 4, 2011, that Navy Seal Team VI carried out the successful raid on Bin Laden’s compound resulting in the master terrorist’s death, put a retaliatory target on the backs of the fallen heroes.
How and why high-level military officials sent these Navy SEAL Team VI heroes into battle without special operations aviation and proper air support.
How and why middle level military brass carries out too many ill-prepared missions to boost their standing with top-level military brass and the Commander-in-Chief in order that they can be promoted.
 How the military restricts special operations servicemen and others from engaging in timely return fire when fired upon by the Taliban and other terrorist groups and interests, thus jeopardizing the servicemen’s lives.
How and why the denial of requested pre-assault fire may have contributed to the shoot down of the Navy SEAL Team VI helicopter and the death of these special operations servicemen.
How Afghani forces accompanying the Navy SEAL Team VI servicemen on the helicopter were not properly vetted and how they possibly disclosed classified information to the Taliban about the mission, resulting in the shoot down of the helicopter.
How military brass, while prohibiting any mention of a Judeo-Christian God, invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen Navy SEAL Team VI heroes who disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen by damning them as infidels to Allah. A video of the Muslim cleric’s “prayer” will be shown with a certified translation.
The Thursday press conference has not been highly publicized. The press release also criticizes the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as the “result of politics” and “poorly conceived and implemented, resulting in the deaths of thousands and the maiming of tens of thousands of our brave heroes.”
The Blaze will be covering the press conference and will also be investigating some of the claims being made by these military families. Stay tuned Thursday for additional updates to this story.
 Featured image via Bill West/The Star-Beacon /AP
__________________________

DID AN IMAM REALLY USE ARABIC PRAYER TO COVERTLY DAMN FALLEN SEAL TEAM 6 MEMBERS TO HELL DURING THEIR FUNERAL?


 
Parents of fallen service members spoke at a press conference on Thursday morning, an event during which they accused the U.S. government of complicity in the deaths of their sons. The families highlighted a number of grievances, including the notion that military brass invited a Muslim cleric to their children’s funeral in 2011 — an imam who they claim “disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen.”
Three families of fallen Navy SEAL Team 6 special forces members and one family of an Army National Guardsman held the event at the National Press Club to make this startling allegation, among many others. Their children perished during the fatal Chinook helicopter crash that occurred in Afghanistan on August 6, 2011. The presser was an effort, as noted in a press release, to corroborate the notion that the U.S. government is “as much responsible for the deaths of their sons as is the Taliban.”
Did an Imam Use Arabic to Covertly Damn Fallen Seal Team 6 Members to Hell During Their Funeral? | Afghanistan
Photo Credit: AP File Photo
The prayer
As for the claim about the Muslim cleric, the families believe that the faith leader attempted to intentionally sully the memory of their sons by “damning them as infidels to Allah.” The group showed video of the prayer to prove their contentions, complete with translation.
Audio from the ceremony, which has been circling for at least a few months, includes a U.S. soldier speaking in English; he begins the ceremony by appealing to the “almighty and awesome God” and goes on to honor the fallen, speaking directly to God and invoking Christian scripture in doing so. After the presiding officer concludes, the imam’s purportedly controversial prayer begins; it is this latter portion that has sparked outrage among the families.
See the American prayer, below:
On Wednesday, TheBlaze spoke with attorney Larry Klayman who is representing the grieving parents to learn more about the Arabic comments in question. Noting that he has consulted with a certified translator, he paraphrased the meaning of the imam’s words as follows: “That the fallen seals should be damned and go to hell as infidels.”
If this translation is valid, the notion that it was spoken over U.S. service members bodies at a funeral is potentially problematic, although it should be noted that the prayer may have been intended only for the Afghan soldiers who perished. Let’s first explore what the Muslims leader said during his sermon. Here’s one translation that has been given of the cleric’s comments (this is the version that Klayman showed at the press conference along with video of the prayer):
“Amen I shelter in Allah from the devil who has been cast with stones. In the name of Allah the merciful giver. The companions of the fire are not equal with the companions of heaven. The companions of heaven are the winners. Had we sent this Koran to a mountain, you would have seen the mountain prostrated in fear of Allah. Such examples are what we present to the people; to the people, so that they would think. Blessings are to your God, the God of glory of what they describe. And peace be upon the messengers and thanks be to Allah the lord of both universes.”
And here’s the audio, with subtitles:
Another translation that was commissioned by Islam expert Stephen Coughlin is somewhat less pointed:
“I announce the evil by all-aha. By the name of  the merciful all-aha. People of hell and people of heaven are not equal (even, not the same), people of  heaven are the winners, if we [unintelligible word] the Koran on the mountain, you will see, you will see him in submission and humble of alla-aha’s fear. Those (who are in submission) are examples for the people (the public) may these people (the public) remember, praise alla-aha. Alla-aha God of glory, of the people behaviors (he is wondering or questioning the people’s behaviors). And peace to the Prophets, thanks to alla-aha, please (asking alla-aha) to forgive him, comfort him and accept him in paradise. [The prayer ends, however this subject was talking to some audience he was telling them I LOVE TO....then the audio ended].”
Here’s another version of the imam’s comments without subtitles and in Arabic


Bee's Note:


Navy Seal Team 6 Families Press Conference Live Stream 10:00am EST posted on "Before its News"

Extortion 17 to Benghazi to Obama







Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Families of Seal Team VI to Reveal How Islamic Appeasement Led to their Murder

May 8, 2013 By  
FRONT PAGE MAGAZINE
seal-team-6-2-ts300

The event appears to be set for tomorrow at the National Press Club and it may have revelations as shocking as those about Benghazi.

Three families of Navy SEAL Team VI special forces servicemen, along with one family of an Army National Guardsman, will appear at a press conference on May 9, 2013, to disclose never before revealed information about how and why their sons along with 26 others died in a fatal helicopter crash in Afghanistan on August 6, 2011, just a few months after the successful raid on the compound of Osama Bin Laden that resulted in the master terrorist’s death.
Accompanying the families of these dead Navy SEAL Team VI special operations servicemen will be retired military experts verifying their accounts of how and why the government is as much responsible for the deaths of their sons as is the Taliban.
The areas of inquiry at the press conference will include but not be limited to:
1.    How President Obama and Vice President Biden, having disclosed on May 4, 2011, that Navy Seal Team VI carried out the successful raid on Bin Laden’s compound resulting in the master terrorist’s death, put a retaliatory target on the backs of the fallen heroes.
2.    How and why high-level military officials sent these Navy SEAL Team VI heroes into battle without special operations aviation and proper air support.
3.    How and why middle-level military brass carries out too many ill-prepared missions to boost their standing with top-level military brass and the Commander-in-Chief in order that they can be promoted.
4.    How the military restricts special operations servicemen and others from engaging in timely return fire when fired upon by the Taliban and other terrorist groups and interests, thus jeopardizing the servicemen’s lives.
5.    How and why the denial of requested pre-assault fire may have contributed to the shoot down of the Navy SEAL Team VI helicopter and the death of these special operations servicemen.
6. How Afghani forces accompanying the Navy SEAL Team VI servicemen on the helicopter were not properly vetted and how they possibly disclosed classified information to the Taliban about the mission, resulting in the shoot down of the helicopter.

7. How military brass, while prohibiting any mention of a Judeo-Christian God, invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen Navy SEAL Team VI heroes who disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen by damning them as infidels to Allah. A video of the Muslim cleric’s “prayer” will be shown with a certified translation.
This is a Freedom Watch event and I don’t know why it isn’t getting more attention, aside from the poor timing as it comes too close to the renewed wave of interest in Benghazigate.
The last allegation, if true, is certainly obscenely despicable and a final insult.
About 
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.



MOTHER OF MURDERED BENGHAZI VICTIM TEARS INTO HILLARY CLINTON

MOTHER OF MURDERED BENGHAZI VICTIM TEARS INTO HILLARY CLINTON DURING EMOTIONAL INTERVIEW: ‘I BLAME HER’


THE BLAZE
 

Pat Smith, Mother of Slain Benghazi Victim, Blames Hillary Clinton for Benghazi

Pat Smith, the outspoken still-grieving mother of slain State Department official Sean Smith, blasted the Obama administration over its non-existent efforts to investigate the Benghazi attack that took the life of her son and for failing to ensure the safety of staff overseas on Sept. 11, 2012.
Joining Jake Tapper on CNN Tuesday, Smith said she blames former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for not being on top of her department before the attack and for not getting Americans the help they needed after the assault began.
“How are you holding up?” Tapper asked the mother.
“Terrible,” she said. “I cry every night. I don’t sleep at night. I need answers.”
Among the questions that Smith wants — and deserves — answers to, she wants to know: “Why was there no security for him when they were supposed to have security, and the security that they did have was called back.”
“It’s just things do not add up and I’m just told lies,” she added.
Smith agreed that the deadly Benghazi attacks have become too politicized and wants people in Washington, D.C., to “just do their job.” It shouldn’t be a political issue, she explained.
She said she got one call from a clerk within the Obama administration shortly after the attack happened, but since then “all they have told me is I am not part of the immediately family so they don’t want to tell me anything.”
Tapper then played video of Clinton’s testimony before Congress, during which she yelled, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” when asked about the cause of the attack.


“Well, that’s what I want to know,” Smith shot back. “Why did it happen? And she is in charge. Why couldn’t she do something about it? I blame her.”
She continued ripping Clinton: “That’s her department. She’s supposed to be on top of it, and yet she claims that she knows nothing – it wasn’t told to her…Who’s running the place?”
Tapper noted that he hasn’t been able to get any answers on Benghazi either, but also expressed surprise at the fact that no one in the Obama administration has reached out to her other than the clerk.
“They don’t want to talk to me because they are afraid of what I might say,” Smith replied. “Because I might say something like, ‘who is at fault and why are they covering it up?’ And they are covering it up because I haven’t heard any answers.”
Watch the segment via CNN below:



Putin keeps John Kerry waiting for THREE HOURS


May 8, 2013
Putin keeps John Kerry waiting for THREE HOURS during his visit to Russia for meetings over Syria as relationship between the U.S. and Russia remains frosty
kerry in Russia
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was looking to strengthen ties with Russia as he tries to put an end to the dictatorial regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, but instead he was met with the coldest of receptions.
Russian President Vladimir Putin kept Kerry waiting three hours before their meeting at the Kremlin on Tuesday and continuously fiddled with his pen as the top American diplomat spoke about the ongoing crisis in Syria.
Kerry’s visit to Moscow comes as he seeks Russian help in ending Syria’s civil, telling President Putin that common interest in a stable Middle East could bridge divisions among the big powers.
  • Secretary of State’s visit to Moscow comes as U.S. tries to gather international support for action against Assad regime in Syria
  • Russia has been reluctant to commit to taking action
Putin, however, made no mention in his own public remarks of the conflict in Syria, which has generated some of the frostiest exchanges between Washington and Moscow since the Cold War.
Yet with the killing now in a third year and no end in sight as U.N. intervention remains stymied by international arguments, Kerry struck a positive tone as he set about trying to narrow differences sufficiently to agree a plan for a settlement that proved out of reach at talks in Geneva almost a year ago.
‘The United States believes that we share some very significant common interests with respect to Syria – stability in the region, not having extremists creating problems throughout the region and elsewhere,’ Kerry told Putin.
‘We have both embraced in the Geneva communiqué a common approach, so it’s my hope that today we’ll be able to dig in to that a little bit and see if we can find common ground.’
The United States and Russia endorsed a plan in Geneva last June that called for the creation of a transitional government in Syria, where at least 70,000 people have now been killed since March 2011, but which left open the question of what would happen to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Long-time arms supplier to Assad and suspicious of Western aid for opponents of authoritarian leaders around the world, Moscow says Assad’s departure must not be a precondition for a dialogue among Syrians to end the conflict.
Russia, backed by China, has refused Western appeals to consider sanctions on Assad, vetoing three U.N. Security Council resolutions condemning his crackdown on opposition groups.
The United States are reluctant to give military aid directly to an insurgency that includes militant Islamists but alarmed that violence is continuing and may spread. The superpower is making a new push for a joint international approach to contain the conflict.
Israeli air strikes in Syria have heightened a sense of urgency in a region strained by confrontations between Assad’s ally Iran and other Arab powers, as well as the hostility between Israel and its neighbors, notably Iran and Hezbollah.
Differences over Syria have deepened strains in ties between the United States and Russia that are also hampered by what Washington views as a crackdown on Russian civil society since Putin began a third term as president a year ago after the biggest protests since he first rose to power in 2000.
Making the rounds: Kerry toured Red Square in Moscow during his visit, which is meant to be one to shore up Russian support
Kerry’s visit is intended to help improve relations and pave the way Obama to hold talks with Putin in September, when Russia hosts a summit of the Group of 20 nations. Obama and Putin are also to meet at a Group of Eight summit in Britain in June.
Kerry is publicly trying to hint how there are many issues on the table- including ‘North Korea, Iran, Syria’ and economic cooperation- that could be good working ground for U.S.-Russia relations.
Putin, a former KGB spy who accused Washington of helping foment protests against him last year, was less effusive than Kerry but said he was glad to see him in Moscow and expressed hope that relations would improve.
Both sides have said they hope to increase cooperation on counter-terrorism following the Boston Marathon bombings, which U.S. officials suspect were carried out by two ethnic Chechens who once lived in Russia.
‘We recently had a substantial phone conversation with President Obama. And we had an opportunity to discuss many aspects of our relations,’ Putin said.
‘I think it is very important that our key ministries, our foreign ministries and agencies, work together to resolve the acutest issues of the modern world.’
 Article submitted by:  Veronica Coffin

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

BENGHAZI - Overview and Video

Americans Stand with Israel
by Bee Sting
May 7, 2013
BENGHAZI, LIBYA
Tomorrow morning, Wednesday, May 8th, Fox News will be airing the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.  The families of these  heroes of Benghazi may finally have closure and peace of mind.

The deceptions presented over the past eight months by the Obama administration are too numerous to list, but one thing we know for certain is the American people and the world have been lied to, with first blame being contributed to a video, followed months later to hearing Hillary Clinton scream (yes, she screamed!) "What difference does it make?!"  She added insult to injury and perhaps this same committee will find Hillary in contempt for obstruction of justice.

"DAMNING: The Complete Benghazi Timeline in Spreadsheet Format" is posted here:  http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/05/damning-proof-of-dereliction-of-duty.html

Ambassador John Bolton believes "Benghazi could bring down Obama administration" and his comments are printed in The Washington Times.


No explanation necessary for the following video, of Stephen's being dragged out by the Islamic terrorist.  I am sharing it because Americans deserve to know exactly what happened the night of September 11, 2012.  I must forewarn everyone that the video is GRAPHIC:

Someone posted a note to the video, stating:  speak arabic, and they are saying "be careful with him" "he is alive, thank God" they are checking his pulse. Its not the same scene as Gadafi where they fucked him in his ass with a knife!"  

He may have translated what they were saying in Arabic, but as for not raping the Ambassador - like Gadafi - that is untrue.  I have seen the photos, posted all over the Internet.  Apparently, some of the terrorist thought they were going to "save" for their home movie collection.
Speaking of movies, the Egyptian-American sitting in prison for making the video that was blamed for this terrorist attack, could not even conceive of the horrific scenes revealed in Benghazi, through the Muslim's own "home movies" and pictures!  

THE BENGHAZI COVERUP

Some blame the US Military; however, that is also a false flag!

In case you don't think the words of our Administration ring loudly across the globe, the You Tube videos of Arabic speaking nations are flooded with President Obama and Hillary's speeches.  How shameful, that this administration bows and apologizes to the very people who attack, murder and torture our men and women 

May there be truth told tomorrow; may the witnesses be blessed with more courage; and may the leaders in Washington see fit to bring charges of treason to an administration that places our good men's lives in danger, for the sake of an "Election" and/or political correctness.



Hillary Clinton's Fiery Moment at Benghazi Hearing - Despicable!
R.I.P. Ambassador Stevens




Obama Appoints Special Envoy to Afghanistan Who Wanted Iran to Train Afghan Military

May 7, 2013 By   
FRONT PAGE MAGAZINE

Why yes, that is the Center for American Progress logo in the background
Why yes, that is the Center for American Progress logo in the background

Sadly Ahmadinejad was still finishing up his term and could not be appointed the US Special Envoy to Afghanistan. So Obama had to settle for James Dobbins.
With little comment from conservative media, President Obama last week appointed James Dobbins as special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, the high-profile job long occupied by the late Richard Holbrooke.
Kerry made this clear while announcing the appointment. He said, “He [Dobbins] has deep and longstanding relationships in the region … Jim will continue building on diplomatic efforts to bring the conflict to a peaceful conclusion, actively engaging with states in the region and the international community.”
Secretary Kerry was referring, evidently, to Dobbins “deep and longstanding relationship” with Iran.
As Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs and general troubleshooter in the George W. Bush administration, Dobbins proposed to jointly train the Afghan army with Iran. As he said in Congressional testimony in 2007:
“Iranian participation, under American leadership, in a joint program of this sort would be a breathtaking departure after more than 20 years mutual hostility.”
Breathtaking departure would be the word.
Dobbins is a prominent exponent of the idea that America can live with a nuclear Iran, as well as an opponent of the use of military force against Iran’s nuclear program  under any conditions.
There he co-authored a 2011 monograph entitled, “Coping with a Nuclearizing Iran.” In effect, the Dobbins report proposes a don’t ask, don’t tell approach to Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.Dobbins has argued forcefully and frequently against the use of military force against Iran under any circumstances. In a Nov. 16, 2011 article for US News and World Report entitled, “An Attack Would Only Strengthen Iran’s Influence.”
There are plenty of diplomatic jobs that we could just outsource to Saudi Arabia instead of paying lavish salaries to diplomats who only repeat Saudi talking points. It would seem that we could just as easily outsource James Dobbins’ job to Iran.

About 
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.

Monday, May 6, 2013

Benghazi: It's All Coming Apart

Hillary Clinton, Secy of State

Diplomat: U.S. Special Forces told "you can't go" to Benghazi during attacks
By 
SHARYL ATTKISSON / 
CBS NEWS/ May 6, 2013, 12:00 PM
U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the consulate attack in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012.
U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the consulate attack in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012. / CBS NEWS
The deputy of slain U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens has told congressional investigators that a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by U.S. Special Operations Command South Africa.

The account from Gregory Hicks is in stark contrast to assertions from the Obama administration, which insisted that nobody was ever told to stand down and that all available resources were utilized. Hicks gave private testimony to congressional investigators last month in advance of his upcoming appearance at a congressional hearing Wednesday.
According to excerpts released Monday, Hicks told investigators that SOCAFRICA commander Lt. Col. Gibson and his team were on their way to board a C-130 from Tripoli for Benghazi prior to an attack on a second U.S. compound "when [Col. Gibson] got a phone call from SOCAFRICA which said, 'you can't go now, you don't have the authority to go now.' And so they missed the flight ... They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it."
No assistance arrived from the U.S. military outside of Libya during the hours that Americans were under attack or trapped inside compounds by hostile forces armed with rocket-propelled grenades, mortars and AK-47 rifles.
Hicks told congressional investigators that if the U.S. had quickly sent a military aircraft over Benghazi, it might have saved American lives. The U.S. Souda Bay Naval Base is an hour's flight from Libya.


"I believe if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split. They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them," Hicks testified. Two Americans died in the morning mortar attack.
Obama administration officials have insisted that no military resources could have made it in time. A White House official told CBS News that, at the start of the attack, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta "looked at available options, and the ones we exercised had our military forces arrive in less than 24 hours, well ahead of timelines laid out in established policies."
Hicks is expected to be the first ground-level eyewitness to speak publicly in the nearly eight months since the terrorist attacks that killed Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans. When Stevens went missing, Hicks became the Chief of Mission for the U.S. in Libya.
Ambassador Susan Rice and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton initially indicated the attacks were not planned acts of terror, but an outgrowth of a spontaneous protest over an anti-Islamic YouTube video. Unidentified government officials removed references to terrorism and al Qaeda from so-called "talking points" released to the public shortly after the attacks.
Below are the released excerpts from Hicks' April interview with congressional investigators on the House Oversight Committee.
Q: But do you think, you know, if an F-15, if the military had allowed a jet to go fly over, that it might have prevented [the second attack]?
A: Yeah, and if we had gotten clearance from the Libyan military for an American plane to fly over Libyan airspace. The Libyans that I talked to and the Libyans and other Americans who were involved in the war have told me also that Libyan revolutionaries were very cognizant of the impact that American and NATO airpower had with respect to their victory. They are under no illusions that American and NATO airpower won that war for them. And so, in my personal opinion, a fast-mover flying over Benghazi at some point, you know, as soon as possible might very well have prevented some of the bad things that happened that night.
Q : The theory being, the folks on the ground that are doing these -- committing these terrorist attacks look up, see a heavy duty airplane above, and decide to hightail it?
A: I believe that if -- I believe if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split. They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them.
******

 Sharyl Attkisson
ON TWITTER »
Sharyl Attkisson is a CBS News investigative correspondent based in Washington. All of her stories, videos and blogs are available here.