Saturday, August 10, 2013

The Invasion of Sharia Law


THE COMMON SENSE SHOW
by Dave Hodges
July 30, 2013


Just like S. 744, Sharia law, illegal immigration and the free trade agreements are designed by the globalists to subvert the Constitution and to undermine the national identity of the United States.
As I continue to sacrifice my Fourth Amendment rights while I take off my shoes and subject myself to being x-rayed and illegally molested by TSA officials at the airport, I am constantly reminded of the threat that violent Jihadists pose to Americans everywhere. However, not all jihadists are tasked with the commission of perpetrating mass murder upon the citizens of Israel and America. Many jihadists have altered their modus operandi and have subsequently adopted a type of stealth and cultural jihad as evidenced by excerpts of the following Muslim Brotherhood 2007 strategic memo which states that “The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging their miserable house…”
Omar Ahmad, co-founder the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), made his anti-Christian bias crystal clear in a July 4, 1998 San Ramon Valley Herald article in which Ahmad stated “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America.” This philosophy, commonly dubbed, Sharia law, is being systematically implemented right under our American noses and in a multitude of local venues. The courts in Michigan, Oklahoma and Florida are recognizing Sharia Law. Funny, I do not remember reading about this in the Constitution.
Nowhere is Sharia law being imposed upon the American people with greater vehemence than in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn, Michigan. Dearborn resident, eighteen year old Negeen Mayel, whose parents escaped from Afghanistan after the Russian invasion, couldn’t escape the Sharia law-enforcement arm of the Dearborn Police Department. Mayel, a Christian, was filming her four fellow Christian missionaries while they were discussing the Gospel with Muslims at the annual 2010 Dearborn Arab Festival. A Dearborn police officer ordered Mayel to turn off her camera and when she didn’t turn it off quickly enough; she was arrested and charged in the Dearborn District Court for failing to obey a police officer’s order. Amazingly, in his court testimony, the arresting officer admitted that the filming by Mayel was indeed not a crime.
A growing number of Americans are slowly becoming cognizant of the threat being posed by the imposition of Sharia law upon an unwilling and often unaware non-Muslim American public. In the 2000 census, Dearborn consisted of 30,000 Arabs in a city of 100,000 people. This fact alone is not alarming. But what is alarming is when the mayor of Dearborn, John B. O’Reilly, Jr., an attorney who should know better, is catering to this growing minority as the city of Dearborn is offering preferential treatment which favors Sharia law advocates over Christians and other non-Muslim Americans. In the case of Mayel, the Dearborn police, with the approval of the mayor, replaced the Constitutional protections offered by the First Amendment with the creation of free speech zones which are inherently free speech inhibitors. As such, Dearborn’s mayor officially endorsed the Sharia law prohibition against proselytizing Muslims in stark violation of the First Amendment to the American Constitution which protects free speech. Subsequently, the Dearborn police, acting as Sharia law enforcement agents, handcuffed and jailed all four Christian missionaries and formally charged the group with Breach of Peace despite the fact that none of the Muslim attendees claimed any level of harassment by the Christian missionaries.
In response to the protest which followed the Mayel’s group arrest, the Dearborn mayor issued a press release in which he alleged that “…they (act) with the intent to disrupt a local festival and misrepresent facts….”  The mayor seems to be saying that preaching the Gospel constitutes a gross misrepresentation of facts and the filming of the preaching is disruptive to the public order. Mayor O’Reilly went on to defend the arrests by stating that the Christian missionaries were 30 feet outside the free speech zone provided by Dearborn city officials. (Funny, I thought the entire country was a free speech zone.)  Mayor O’Reilly must have been absent that day in law school when his law professor discussed the First Amendment.
The persecution of Dearborn’s Christians even extends into the Dearborn Public Schools as Dearborn’s teachers and coaches are not even afforded a free speech zone from which to espouse their beliefs. Consider the case of Gerald Marszalek, a 35 year veteran wrestling coach in the Dearborn Public Schools, and an inducted member of the Michigan High School Coaches Hall of Fame was fired from his coaching position by Fordson High School’s Principal, Imad Fadlallah. Fadlallah allegedly retaliated against Marszalek over an Islamic student’s conversion to Christianity despite having no direct proof that Marszalek acted illegally or was in violation of any school district policy. The Marszalek case is being adjudicated in U.S. District Court of Eastern Michigan.
The radicalization of American communities does not begin and end with Muslim radicals in the Dearborn Public Schools or in the Dearborn mayoral office, nor does it end with the police department in Dearborn. This brand of extremism disturbingly extends directly into our Federal Courts. On March 3rd, the 13th Circuit Court Judge, Richard A. Nielson, recently ruled that a civil suit between the Islamic Education Center of Tampa, Florida and four of its trustees (Case number 03-03497) be remanded to another venue. Judge Nielson did not remand this case to another court of law; rather, the Judge ordered that the suit be settled under “Ecclesiastical Islamic Law”. Ecclesiastical Islamic Law is a euphemism for Sharia law and the Judge has apparently created a de facto “Court of Appeals” in which the Constitutional prohibition which formerly separated church and state has been flagrantly violated. In effect, Judge Nielsen has legitimized the tenets of Sharia law as a legal precedent to adjudicate civil disputes in America involving Muslims. Perhaps at some point in time, Judge Nielsen was John O’Reilly’s law school professor.

Can one imagine the outcry if the shoe were suddenly on the other foot and a Muslim missionary was arrested for peacefully espousing his/her faith at a Christian event?  Imagine the indignation of the ACLU and the liberal media if a stellar Muslim wrestling coach was removed from his position by a Christian principal under the same set of circumstances as in the Marszalek case?
Today, a growing number of Jews, Arabs, Christians, non-Muslims and Muslims have set aside their differences to join together in a concerted effort in order to thwart the growing threat of Sharia law and global jihad. It is time that all Americans, regardless of their ethnic or religious background join this movement to preserve what is left of the United States Constitution.
sharia dominate the worldNo reasonable American would ethically or legally challenge the right of any religious group the freedom to practice their religion. In fact, most Americans would defend to the death the right for any religious group to practice their faith including those persons belonging to CAIR. However, even the legitimate application of multiculturalism does not and should not advocate for the establishment of another parallel supreme law of the land, much less a system of beliefs that would supplant the United States Constitution. However, it is happening here and now and the encroachment of Sharia law upon the Constitutional liberties of Americans is a growing and persistent threat.
The right for any Muslim group to practice and enforce the tenets of Sharia law should be honored and protected, but the practice should effectively end when it reaches the end of my constitutionally protected infidel nose.

http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/07/30/the-invasion-of-sharia-law/



BLIND TO TERROR: THE U.S. GOVERNMENT'S DISASTROUS MUSLIM OUTREACH EFFORTS



Bomb explodes near the Finish Line - Boston, Massachusetts

BLIND TO TERROR: THE U.S. GOVERNMENT'S DISASTROUS MUSLIM OUTREACH EFFORTS AND THE IMPACT ON U.S. MIDDLE EAST POLICY

by Patrick S. Poole

Why has the U.S. government called certain Islamic groups supporters of terror in federal court, and then turned around and called these same organizations "moderates" and embraced them as outreach partners? In a number of cases from the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations, the leaders of these organizations (some of whom are now in federal prison) were under active investigation at the same time they were meeting with senior U.S. leaders at the White House and the Capitol and helping develop U.S. policy. Now these same Islamic organizations and leaders have openly encouraged a purge of counterterrorism training that have effectively blinded law enforcement, homeland security, and intelligence agencies to active terror threats as seen in the inaction of the FBI concerning the Boston bombing suspects and other terror cases. This study poses serious questions as to the efficacy and even security concerns about U.S. government outreach to Islamic groups, which often turn out to be Islamist militants, enemies of Islamic moderation, and even supporters of terrorism.
whitehouse meeting on marathon bombing
Obama meets with members of his national security team following the Boston Marathon bombings investigation. Pictured, from left, are: FBI Director Robert Mueller; Lisa Monaco, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; Attorney General Eric Holder; Deputy National Security Advisor Tony Blinken; and Vice President Joe Biden.

 The aftermath of the April 15, 2013 bombings in Boston, Massachusetts, has focused attention on the failure of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) to carry out an adequate investigation of the suspected bombers despite warnings from Russian authorities. This failure has partially been attributed to a full scale campaign of political correctness waged inside the bureau and throughout the U.S. government under the Obama administration against any attempt to link jihadi terrorism with anything remotely connected to Islam of any variety (the most radical versions included).[1] This has extended into other segments of the government as well, particularly the Department of Defense.[2]
One of the primary contributors to this widespread political correctness campaign has been the U.S. government's disastrous Muslim outreach policies extending back to the Clinton administration and the 1993 World Trade Center bombings. The U.S. government's historical outreach program, regardless of whether it has been a Democrat or Republican in the White House, has been based on a schizophrenic policy: In many cases federal prosecutors have gone into federal court and identified American Islamic organizations and leaders as supporters of terrorism, and no sooner have left court before government officials openly embrace these same organizations and leaders as moderates and outreach partners. In several notable cases, the FBI's outreach partners have been under active FBI criminal investigation and were later convicted on terrorism-related charges at the time the outreach occurred.
In the case of the Cambridge, Massachusetts, mosque attended by the suspected Boston marathon bombers, when the plethora of extremist ties to the Islamic Society of Boston were reported, a mosque spokesman replied that they could not be extremists since they regularly participated in outreach programs with the FBI, Department of Justice and Homeland Security.[3]
This exemplifies the chronic failure of the U.S. government's outreach programs.

OUTREACH FAILURE: THEN AND NOW



Patrick Poole is a counterterrorism consultant and an investigative reporter on terrorism and national security issues. This article appeared June 4, 2013 in the MERIA Journal Volume 17, Number 2 (Summer 2013). The Journal is a publication of the GLORIA Center for Global Research in International Affairs. The article is archived at http://www.gloria-center.org/2013/06/the-u-s-governments-disastrous-muslim-outreach-efforts-and-the-impact-on-u-s-middle-east-policy-blind-to-terror1/





Friday, August 9, 2013

SEAL TEAM SIX’s ‘Mysterious’ Deaths:

SEAL TEAM SIX’s ‘Mysterious’ Deaths: Did They Just Drop From The Sky? Is There More Than Meets The Eye?

Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

‘Sudden death’, especially involving one’s nearest and dearest, often leaves a person grappling with unbearable pain, wondering: How the hell did this happen? Yet, even when one is given a medical examiner’s explanation, the ‘bolt out of the blue factor’ can still leave one absolutely reeling. Familiar terrain.
And, even if a loved one dies while performing otherwise risky operational duties, answers to reasonable inquiries must be forthcoming. Besides, not only is it a moral imperative to inquire and receive as much information as possible, but requests for an official autopsy is the norm via accident scene reconstructions, from whatever level of officialdom necessary.
That being said, officialdom’s total stonewall regarding 22 SEAL deaths, on the heels of the much ballyhooed killing of Osama Bin Laden, is unprecedented, even in the ‘secret’ netherworld of special ops forces. Many Generals (and special ops members) are indeed questioning the seemingly unfathomable ‘official’ narrative, to say the least. Added to the fact that a rescue team was held back, and each family offered up the same narrative to those ‘investigating’ the tragedy – that their sons warned that leaks were jeopardizing their missions – well, their deaths have become nothing short of ‘mysterious’.
NEVERTHELESS, a trusted contact, ‘terror hunter’ Tom Trento blew the lid off of the initial cover up with his blockbuster interview SEAL TEAM SIX spars off against Obama Inc. In tandem, the popular radio show host/author, Michael Savage, is in hot pursuit. One way or another the skeletons will pour forth, simply because a band of SEAL brothers are not letting go. Even Obama Inc. will eventually have to admit that tackling with them is way out of their league. These aren’t guys who back off from ANYTHING, not even this criminal regime! Besides, isn’t it curious that stories re the above, from the ‘scooping’ media, are having certain technical problems?

NAVY SEAL’S DAD: OBAMA SENT MY SON TO HIS DEATH

Tells Michael Savage ‘they knew something was up’ …embedded audio

The father of one of the 22 Navy SEALs killed in August 2011 when their Chinook helicopter was shot down by the Taliban in Afghanistan, told talk-host Michael Savage he believes the U.S. government sent his son and his colleagues to their deaths.
  • After Vice President Joe Biden revealed that SEAL Team 6 carried out the operation that killed Osama bin Laden in May 2011, Strange said the members of his son’s team gave startling indications to their families they were about to meet their demise.
Charles Strange, the father of slain SEAL Michael Strange, told Savage Wednesday night that in June 2011, on at least three separate occasions his son grabbed him by the bicep and announced that he had prepared his will.
The bewildered father finally was able to find out what it all meant.
Michael Strange, his father recalled, said, “Something’s going on with the team. Somebody’s leaking things out. Something’s going on.”
Savage, reacting with emotion, asked: “Your son knew he was being sent to his death?”
“They knew,” Strange replied. “They knew something was up. Every one of them.”
Other families of the victims have reported similar experiences with their sons the last time they saw them, Strange said.
Strange said documents related to the crash that he obtained show that, among other anomalies, the rescue team was held back.
“This was all planned,” he said. “I have it in the paperwork.”
Strange affirmed that there was no chase helicopter or any other kind of support for the team.
“So, you’re saying they planned to execute your son and the others on purpose?” Savage asked.
“One hundred percent, sir,” Strange replied.
Investigation
Prompted by the concerns expressed by family members, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said his subcommittee on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is investigating the crash.
As WND reported in May, Strange recalled to the National Press Club in Washington his experience with President Obama at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware Aug. 9, 2011, when the remains of 30 U.S. troops were brought home from Afghanistan.
He leaned over to whisper into President Obama’s ear to ask if there would be a congressional investigation into the death of his son.
President Obama whispered back, “We will look very, very, very deep into this.”
But Strange said  he hadn’t heard a word since that encounter.
The families have filed a lawsuit against President Obama, Vice President Biden, the Taliban, the governments of Afghanistan and Iran, because the Islamic regime promises to pay $10,000 for every dead U.S. service member.
Among their many suspicions, the families question the sudden replacement of seven Afghan commandos on board the helicopter just before takeoff. The seven who died in the attack are not the seven listed in the flight manifest. The families say that to this day, they don’t know the identities of the dead Afghans. Strange noted that the chopper’s black box was never recovered and doubts the explanation that it was washed away in a flash flood.
Most significantly, ‘dropping like flies’ is more than resonant when it comes to this criminal leadership. After all, even though the exact circumstances of several ‘too close for comfort’ deaths are varied, the fact of the matter is that those who attempt to ‘out’ the regime’s criminality, in one arena or another, are indeed ‘mysteriously’ dying. Yes, these are cold, hard facts, despite the silence from Obama’s media mouthpieces. As a result, the general media is, to be generous, bereft of ‘inquiring minds’. Some might say, dare this blog suggest, complicit.


Email Company Used By Edward Snowden Shuts Down

Email Company Used By Edward Snowden Shuts Down Rather Than Hand Data Over To Feds

 
8/08/2013 @ 3:45PM 
When Edward Snowden emailed journalists and activists in July to invite them to a briefing at the Moscow airport during his long stay there, he used the email account “edsnowden@lavabit.com” according to one of the invitees. Texas-based Lavabit came into being in 2004 as an alternative to Google’s Gmail, as an email provider that wouldn’t scan users’ email for keywords. Being identified as the provider of choice for the country’s most famous NSA whistleblower led to a flurry of attention for Lavabit and its encrypted email services, from journalists, and also, apparently, from government investigators. Lavabit founder Ladar Levison announced Thursday that he’s shutting down the company rather than cooperating with a government investigation (presumably into Snowden).
Lavabit’s website now displays a message about the shutdown, available in full below, along with a request for help paying the legal bill to fight the government in court.
“I have been forced to make a difficult decision: to become complicit in crimes against the American people or walk away from nearly ten years of hard work by shutting down Lavabit,” writes Levison. “After significant soul searching, I have decided to suspend operations.”
It’s unclear whether the government has already seized the company’s servers. Levison says that he’s under a gag order and thus can’t discuss the government investigation that he’s been fighting over the last six weeks. Gag orders like that often come with information requests in national security investigations. Nick Merrill of the Calyx Institutefamously spent six years fighting off one of those requests — though the fame only came after the six years were up when he reached a settlement with the government releasing him partially from the gag.
It’s amazing how much the climate in the U.S. has changed that someone like Levison actually feels empowered to write a letter like this one. Merrillfeared being sent to prison if he spoke out publicly about what he felt was an unconstitutional request for a customer’s data.
“I can relate to the difficult choice Mr. Levison is being forced to make, as I made a similar choice in 2004 after I received a National Security Letter demanding information on a client of my ISP, and then spent the better part of a decade challenging the constitutionality of warrantless surveillance in federal court,” says Nick Merrill by email. “It would be one thing if dragnet surveillance was in compliance with the 4th amendment and bedrock American values, and it would be another thing if it was proven to keep us safer. But unfortunately, neither of those is true.”
Update (8/9/13): Another encryption-providing company Silent Circle announced late Thursday that it is preemptively shutting down its email service, saying they “see the writing the wall.”
Presumably, the government is seeking access to Edward Snowden’s email, email metadata, passwords or encryption keys. And presumably, Levison doesn’t want to grant that access.
“I would strongly recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company with physical ties to the United States,” writes Levison, based on his experience. This message seems to be a loud and clear one. Washington, D.C.-based think tank Information Technology and Innovation Foundation predicts that U.S. cloud companies will lose from $21.5 to $35 billion over the next three years. They admit that it is a “rough guess” based onsurveys about the chilling effects of the NSA leaks on U.S.-based cloud businesses.
Update (8/9/13): Edward Snowden drew attention to other American companies in the Guardian, telling Glenn Greenwald that they should take a page from the Lavabit book to protect their users: “Employees and leaders at Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, and the rest of our internet titans must ask themselves why they aren’t fighting for our interests the same way small businesses are. The defense they have offered to this point is that they were compelled by laws they do not agree with, but one day of downtime for the coalition of their services could achieve what a hundred Lavabits could not.”
Meanwhile, Lavabit’s users are not so pleased with the shutdown. Judging from complaints on the Lavabit Facebook wall — e.g., “Shutting down service with no warning and no chance to migrate is complete BULLSH**.” — they care more about service than principles.
Here’s Levison’s full letter:
My Fellow Users,
I have been forced to make a difficult decision: to become complicit in crimes against the American people or walk away from nearly ten years of hard work by shutting down Lavabit. After significant soul searching, I have decided to suspend operations. I wish that I could legally share with you the events that led to my decision. I cannot. I feel you deserve to know what’s going on–the first amendment is supposed to guarantee me the freedom to speak out in situations like this. Unfortunately, Congress has passed laws that say otherwise. As things currently stand, I cannot share my experiences over the last six weeks, even though I have twice made the appropriate requests.
What’s going to happen now? We’ve already started preparing the paperwork needed to continue to fight for the Constitution in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. A favorable decision would allow me resurrect Lavabit as an American company.
This experience has taught me one very important lesson: without congressional action or a strong judicial precedent, I would _strongly_ recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company with physical ties to the United States.
Sincerely,
Ladar Levison
Owner and Operator, Lavabit LLC
Defending the constitution is expensive! Help us by donating to the Lavabit Legal Defense Fund here.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/08/08/email-company-reportedly-used-by-edward-snowden-shuts-down-rather-than-hand-data-over-to-feds/


Zahra' Langhi: Why Libya's revolution didn't work -- and what might

FILMED DEC 2012 • POSTED FEB 2013 • TEDxWomen 2012



TRANSCRIPT (scroll down):
Almost two years have passed since the Libyan Revolution broke out, inspired by the waves of mass mobilization in both the Tunisian and the Egyptian revolutions. I joined forces with many other Libyans inside and outside Libya to call for a day of rage and to initiate a revolution against the tyrannical regime of Gaddafi. And there it was, a great revolution.Young Libyan women and men were at the forefront calling for the fall of the regime, raising slogans of freedom, dignity, social justice. They have shown an exemplary bravery in confronting the brutal dictatorship of Gaddafi. They have shown a great sense of solidarityfrom the far east to the far west to the south. Eventually, after a period of six months of brutal war and a toll rate of almost 50,000 dead, we managed to liberate our country and to topple the tyrant.
Our society, shaped by a revolutionary mindset, became more polarized and has driven away from the ideals and the principles -- freedom, dignity, social justice -- that we first held. Intolerance, exclusion and revenge became the icons of the [aftermath] of the revolution. I am here today not at all to inspire you with our success story of the zipper list and the elections. I'm rather here today to confess that we as a nation took the wrong choice, made the wrong decision. We did not prioritize right. For elections did not bring peace and stability and security in Libya. Did the zipper list and the alternation between female and male candidates bring peace and national reconciliation? No, it didn't. What is it, then? Why does our society continue to be polarized and dominated with selfish politics of dominance and exclusion, by both men and women?


The 10 Countries with the Biggest Oil Reserves

9. Libya – 47,102-48,014 MMbbl

9
Libya is a country in North Africa that is currently undergoing reconstruction after the ouster of its former leader, Muammar Gaddafi. Its economy is largely dependent on the oil sector, with the commodity accounting for 97 percent of all its exports and 80 percent of its gross domestic product. The country has the largest proven reserves in Africa. It is a major contributor to the supply of light, sweet crude oil to the rest of the world.
Bee's note:
Here are scenes/photos of Libya.  I am not sure if the photos are an accurate picture of Libya today, after the Revolution that toppled Gaddafi; but as you can see, Libya was or is quite modern, with beautiful scenes, buildings, and architecture.  
The only pictures I have seen of Libya are those of Benghazi, taken the night our Ambassador Stevens and three other American heroes died - 9/11/2012.
After listening to Ms. Langhi's speech, I found myself curious enough to see what Libya actually looked like - without the al-Qaeda terrorists waving their guns in the air.  Much to my surprise, Libya is a lovely country.  
 "And so just as the womb entirely envelopes the embryo, which grows within it, the divine matrix of compassion nourishes the entire existence. Thus we are told that "My mercy encompasses all things." Thus we are told that "My mercy takes precedence over my anger." - Zahra' Langhi
How sad it is to see such beauty and goodness transformed into a world of horror, devastation, hopelessness, due to the embedded hatred of Islamist, who are the cause of 99% of the terrorism in our world today.
Like Zahra', I also pray that "mercy and compassion" shall rest upon the future generations of the citizens of Libya.    
Libya's archetecture
Welcome to Tripoli
Libya - Training Finance Professionals
What a different picture than the scenes Americans have had to see since last September: 
At this point in time, what difference does it make?
_____________________________