Arabs never intended an independent "Palestinian" state

Tuesday, November 29, 2011 | Ryan Jones

The birth of Israel - November 29, 1947 

Israel on Tuesday marked the 64th anniversary of the November 29, 1947 UN decision to partition the British Mandate for Palestine into Arab and Jewish states, a motion that led to the immediate birth of the State of Israel.

The Palestinians also marked the day, but with mourning, decrying the UN decision as a “sin,” though they simultaneously demand that Israel return to the partition borders that the Arabs originally rejected.

A telling, though ultimately unsurprising, revelation during this year’s anniversary is that the Arab world never intended for there to be an independent Palestinian Arab state.

On the eve of the UN partition vote, a reporter for the Palestine Post spoke to a prominent Arab official in Cairo who noted that King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan, great-grandfather of today’s King Abdullah II, was planning to invade the areas west of the Jordan River in order to expand his kingdom, regardless of whether or not the partition plan passed. (h/t Elder of Ziyon)

Like everyone else at the time, King Abdullah recognized that the Arabs in Syria, Jordan and what would become Israel and the Palestinian Authority areas were all of the same stock, and therefore should live under one flag, his.

Abdullah’s “Greater Syria” scheme was opposed by Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Lebanon, which formed their own bloc with the intention of invading “Palestine” first and placing it under the rule of a protectorate regime.

As it turns out, Abdullah did invade and did seize control of part of the Mandate territory. He later annexed what came to be known as the “West Bank.”

What is clear from these pre-partition rumblings and from Abdullah subsequent actions is that the Arab world never had any interest in an independent Palestinian Arab state, since the so-called “Palestinian” Arabs were no different than Jordanian Arabs - both nationalities that had only recently been invented. And while Egypt and its allies had an interest in containing Abdullah’s expansionism, their agenda was not independence for the Arabs of “Palestine.”

Oddly enough, today the world has accepted the lie that all of the region’s troubles (and most of the world’s troubles) are the result of the Palestinian Arabs not having their own sovereign state.

 http://www.israeltoday.co.il/News/tabid/73/Default.aspx

Note:

The "miracle" of Israel is her ability to survive among nations - nations that continue to threaten her existence.  The Land of Israel is the only safe haven for Jews throughout the world.  Today, the Arab Muslims flock to and are allowed entrance to every country throughout Europe and the West - by the boatloads, by open door policies of these same countries, or by countries such as the United States, listing them as "refugees". 

Sadly, this was not the case for the Jewish people fleeing the claws of a madman who manged to slaughter 6 MILLION Jews in less than six years.  And had these same nations not shut the doors and opened their hearts to the Jews fleeing for their lives, had they been given the status of "refugee", perhaps there would have been a few more survivors during WW2 than there are today.  When I think about the term "refugee" and look back to history, I am amazed at the countries who actually shot thousands of Jews at their borders while the Jewish people sought "refuge"in order to escape the Nazis and the death camps.  It is heart-wrenching to hear about one boat filled with Jewish refugees that was turned back - back into the arms of the awaiting Nazis who were all to eager to murder these few Jewish refugees during the heat of WW2.  

And so I wonder today exactly what or how a nation determines who are "refugees".  What exactly are these Muslims "fleeing"?  Certainly not the clutches of a madman, like Hitler.  There are no death camps today; civil wars among Arab nations, but certainly that would not define half the Arab world as "refugees".   If Muslim nations are murdering Muslims, is the world expected to take in the entire population of a Muslim country? For what purpose?  Isn't this exactly what is happening throughout Europe?  Aren't these same Muslim "refugees" now attempting to promote their own Sharia laws within the borders of the United States and Europe?  If entire groups of Muslims are claiming refugee status, why aren't one of the 21 Arab nations inviting them to enter their own borders?  Could it be that the Arabs have a method to their madness, by infiltrating non-Muslim nations in order to conquer the very nations that have freely welcomed them, only to have these Islamic peoples use the laws of our land against us, attempting to make the United States and other nations predominately "Islamic" in nature - removing our very freedoms under our Constitution in the process?  The Muslim "refugee" status given to Muslims is a fallacy and the world has been duped and believes this lie, just as it believes the lie that the Arabs seek an "independent" Palestinian state.  

I would suggest that to the Muslim world, the "Palestinian" state they seek is the WORLD - NOT just the State of Israel.  

And I conclude with the fact that as the world blames the tiny State of Israel for all the problems in the Middle East, the Jews today would be hunted down and slaughtered just as they were during WW2, if it were not for the fact that Israel survives, prosperous, and remains the one safe haven for Jews throughout this world.  A living, breathing Jew is what makes the Arabs as hostile today as the hostility that predominated an upside down world during WW2.

FOOTNOTE:
Please take a moment to visit the following link, for amazing historical information:


http://historyscoper.com/tlwjerusalem.html