Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Allow me the honor of giving you a brief lesson in Mecca's many prolix attributes. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: It is impracticable to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting Mecca without exploiting the inner unity of our national will. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that I, for one, could hazard a guess and say that Mecca's favorite jaded thugs will encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a satanic, stroppy lifestyle in a matter of days? That's why I'm telling you that if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how there is a format Mecca should follow for its next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
Mecca wants to monopolize the press. But what if the tables were turned? How would Mecca like that? The virus of Bulverism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to Mecca's editorials, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that Mecca indisputably intends to enthrone falsehood in the very center of human thought. The direful sequence of that result, so flagrantly conscienceless and insane in itself, is that incontinent pinheads will ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women sooner than you think. At any rate, I've repeatedly pointed out to Mecca that now is the time to redefine the rhetoric and make room for meaningful discussion. That apparently didn't register with it, though. Oh, well; I guess it's easy for us to shake our heads at Mecca's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. It's easy for us to say, "It has been my position and remains my position that Mecca makes assertions that strain credulity." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how grotty and shabby Mecca has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how you may have noticed that it deserves exemplary punishment. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, Mecca shouldn't insult my intelligence. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate its beliefs are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity.
If you believe nothing else that I've written about Mecca, you can believe this: Mecca keeps stating over and over again that sadism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that given the amount of misinformation that Mecca is circulating, I must point out that its ultimata are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. As everyone knows, Mecca receives most of its knowledge from "Nihilism for Dummies". What you might not know, however, is that it plans to move putrid Dadaism from the pusillanimous fringe into a realm of respectability. It has instructed its advocates not to discuss this or even admit to its plan's existence. Obviously, Mecca knows it has something to hide. Mecca's attempts to destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism are much worse than mere Stalinism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation.
Before Mecca once again claims that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction, it should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with its brethren. What does Mecca have to say about all of this? The answer, as expected, is nothing. Mecca may twist the teaching of history to suit its spleeny, catty purposes right after it reads this letter. Let it. One of these days, I will reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of bilious monomaniacs.
To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that Mecca wants nothing less than to hamstring our efforts to follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought. Its representatives then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with debauched scum who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that it is easier for me to imagine a million-dimensional vector space than the number of inconsistencies in Mecca's quips. An obvious parallel from a slightly different context is that if its plan to permit rambunctious, Pecksniffian loan sharks to rise to positions of leadership and authority is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that I wonder if it really believes the things it says. It knows they're not true, doesn't it? Please do not stop reading here, presuming that the answer is apparent and that no further knowledge is needed. Such is surely not the case. In fact, I'd bet no one ever told you that many people are worried that Mecca will popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge the most devious junkies you'll ever see to open new avenues for the expression of hate in the immediate years ahead. I don't like to speculate on uncertain things, but I will say that Mecca's secret passion is to inflict untold misery, suffering, and distress. For shame!
Those points may at first seem unrelated, but when you connect the dots it becomes clear that Mecca's premise (that society is supposed to be lenient towards brassbound, shameless energumens) is its morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Mecca uses this disguised morality to support its blanket statements, thereby making its argument self-refuting. Contrary to what Mecca would have you believe, there is more at play here than its purely political game of parlaying personal and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire. There are ideologies at work, hidden agendas to shove the nation towards colonialism. One must consider the semiotics of recidivism in order to fully understand Mecca's opinions. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Mecca generally tries to keep its distance from the brutal, vitriolic carousers who arouse inter-ethnic suspicion. However, it sees nothing wrong with creating a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy. That's all I have to say. Thanks for letting me express my feelings.
Allow me the honor of giving you a brief lesson in Mecca's many prolix attributes. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: It is impracticable to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting Mecca without exploiting the inner unity of our national will. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that I, for one, could hazard a guess and say that Mecca's favorite jaded thugs will encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a satanic, stroppy lifestyle in a matter of days? That's why I'm telling you that if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how there is a format Mecca should follow for its next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.Mecca wants to monopolize the press. But what if the tables were turned? How would Mecca like that? The virus of Bulverism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to Mecca's editorials, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that Mecca indisputably intends to enthrone falsehood in the very center of human thought. The direful sequence of that result, so flagrantly conscienceless and insane in itself, is that incontinent pinheads will ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women sooner than you think. At any rate, I've repeatedly pointed out to Mecca that now is the time to redefine the rhetoric and make room for meaningful discussion. That apparently didn't register with it, though. Oh, well; I guess it's easy for us to shake our heads at Mecca's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. It's easy for us to say, "It has been my position and remains my position that Mecca makes assertions that strain credulity." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how grotty and shabby Mecca has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how you may have noticed that it deserves exemplary punishment. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, Mecca shouldn't insult my intelligence. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate its beliefs are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity.If you believe nothing else that I've written about Mecca, you can believe this: Mecca keeps stating over and over again that sadism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that given the amount of misinformation that Mecca is circulating, I must point out that its ultimata are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. As everyone knows, Mecca receives most of its knowledge from "Nihilism for Dummies". What you might not know, however, is that it plans to move putrid Dadaism from the pusillanimous fringe into a realm of respectability. It has instructed its advocates not to discuss this or even admit to its plan's existence. Obviously, Mecca knows it has something to hide. Mecca's attempts to destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism are much worse than mere Stalinism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation.Being the analytical sort that I am, I would have to say that if Mecca gets its way, I might very well stampede into the abattoir. By this, I mean that Mecca and its disciples are pigheaded, immature curmudgeons. This is not set down in complaint against them but merely as analysis.
If Mecca can't cite the basis for its claim that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd then it should just shut up about it. I am truly at a loss for words when Mecca asserts that the existence and perpetuation of cameralism is its own moral justification. It can't possibly be serious. I suspect that the real story here is that if Mecca were to waste everyone else's time, social upheaval and violence would follow. It is therefore clear that Mecca's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that it wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to take away as many of Mecca's opportunities for mischief as possible.
I used to think that raving, poxy anthropophagi were the most mean-spirited people on the planet but now I know that while Mecca and other jealous polemics sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that according to it, separatism resonates with the body's natural alpha waves. It might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then Mecca would realize that if you hear it spouting off about how might makes right, you should tell it that we need to educate others about the ventures and demands of the worst sorts of whiney tatterdemalions I've ever seen. Better yet, tell it to stop getting its opinions from short-sighted, vulgar riffraff and start doing some research of its own.
Before Mecca once again claims that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction, it should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with its brethren. What does Mecca have to say about all of this? The answer, as expected, is nothing. Mecca may twist the teaching of history to suit its spleeny, catty purposes right after it reads this letter. Let it. One of these days, I will reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of bilious monomaniacs.My message is clear: Mecca is entirely inconsistent in its views. On one hand, Mecca insists that it is entitled to test another formula for silencing serious opposition. But on the other hand, it favors turning over our country to destructive swaggerers. How much clearer do I have to explain things before you can see its hypocrisy?
To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that Mecca wants nothing less than to hamstring our efforts to follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought. Its representatives then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with debauched scum who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that it is easier for me to imagine a million-dimensional vector space than the number of inconsistencies in Mecca's quips. An obvious parallel from a slightly different context is that if its plan to permit rambunctious, Pecksniffian loan sharks to rise to positions of leadership and authority is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that I wonder if it really believes the things it says. It knows they're not true, doesn't it? Please do not stop reading here, presuming that the answer is apparent and that no further knowledge is needed. Such is surely not the case. In fact, I'd bet no one ever told you that many people are worried that Mecca will popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge the most devious junkies you'll ever see to open new avenues for the expression of hate in the immediate years ahead. I don't like to speculate on uncertain things, but I will say that Mecca's secret passion is to inflict untold misery, suffering, and distress. For shame!Here are a few points to ponder:
- I must really add my voice to the chorus of those who look into the future and consider what will happen if we let Mecca tear down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation.
- It's hopelessly in love with the sound of its own voice.
- Its personal motto is "never forgive and never forget".
Those points may at first seem unrelated, but when you connect the dots it becomes clear that Mecca's premise (that society is supposed to be lenient towards brassbound, shameless energumens) is its morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Mecca uses this disguised morality to support its blanket statements, thereby making its argument self-refuting. Contrary to what Mecca would have you believe, there is more at play here than its purely political game of parlaying personal and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire. There are ideologies at work, hidden agendas to shove the nation towards colonialism. One must consider the semiotics of recidivism in order to fully understand Mecca's opinions. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Mecca generally tries to keep its distance from the brutal, vitriolic carousers who arouse inter-ethnic suspicion. However, it sees nothing wrong with creating a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy. That's all I have to say. Thanks for letting me express my feelings.Note:
Easiest Blog Ever…. Scott Pakin’s auto complaint generator ... is the nifty new link that allows anyone to file a "Complaint" on anyone or any subject with one click of a button! I used it the other day when I filed a "Complaint" about Obama: (see: My complaint about Pres. Barak H. Obama) And, I must give credit to Pakin's Complaint about Mecca. In the coming days, Pakin's auto complaint generator will be used to speak on other subject matters that usually appear in the daily news.
Meanwhile, as today is a busy day on the homefront, preparing for tomorrow's Thanksgiving Day dinner, there will not be much posting in between the baking of pies/cookies; so, until the holiday is over, I apologize for the limited amount of posting on Americans Stand with Israel.
Wishing all my readers a happy and safe Thanksgiving Day!
Bee Sting