Ah... "Hope and Change" for America!
GROUND REPORT
by Phil Olson March 11, 2012
Could it be possible? Congress wants to impeach Barack Hussein Obama? Or is this just another Republican maneuver for election time publicity? According to a March 8, 2012 infowars.com article it is possible that Congress could seek an impeachment on the grounds of unauthorized military use.
According to Congressional rules Barack Obama has violated the rules set that clearly state that the President must seek Congressional approval before using military force. Now he says it was OK because he had international support but how does that make it OK. They aren't our Congress. They don't determine what is right or wrong for us. Our Congress is supposed to determine whether or not to use the military for forceful actions on another country.
This law also clearly states "any use of military force by Obama without explicit consent and authorization of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, Section 4 of the Constitution." So how then, last year, was Barack Hussein Obama able to use military force in Libya? That is the question at hand here.
That is also why Congress is pushing a resolution through Congress, which has been highly underreported by mainstream media, to look into further actions to be taken upon the President.
Since it so explicitly states in the Constitution of this great country that the President must ask permission from Congress to use military forces in another country, and as far as I can tell they believe there is cause for a potential impeachment.
Of course many of us see this as just another great example of Obama overextending his powers. Also, many of us believe this another example or case to be made for an impeachment of our current President. While an impeachment can be a strain on our country it needs to be seriously considered when there are violations as serious as these on the table.
The days of Czars and Executive orders in order to sidestep Congress should end and if it takes an impeachment to do that it is something I and many other Americans would support. We have a President who believes our Constitution is just a "historical document" that is not fit to determine how our country is ran anymore. So he takes it upon himself to sidestep Congress and the Constitution in order to further pave the way for his Marxist/Communist agenda. This needs to be stopped even if it doesn't come down to an impeachment he should at least be warned that steps will be taken to restore our country to its Constitutional foundations.
If he doesn't understand the rules of our country he shouldn't be President of it. He shouldn't be allowed to shred the Constitution anymore. If this continues to happen the only option will be impeachment and since his whole presidency has been an unreported scandal it would not take to much to find the case for impeachment and follow through with it. So remember this President Obama, if you keep abusing your powers steps should and will be taken to remove you from your position in order to preserve the greatness of America and its Constitution.
Note:
Will A Sitting President Finally Be Held Accountable For High Crimes and Misdemeanors? - posted on Infowars, here ....
Bee's Note:
Is it true? Has the forbidden word "impeachment" finally been mentioned among Congress? What took you so long? I can only HOPE that this is not some political stunt by members of Congress to gain votes this November. After all, Americans watching the slow demise of our U.S. Constitution by a President who is suppose to defend the Constitution, place much of the blame on you, dear politicians in Washington, for allowing Obama to ignore the security of our great nation, while spending a majority of his time between vacations and apologizing to the Islamic world for America's War on Terror - after being attacked on 9/11.
Mr. Nobel Peace Prize winner and Apologist for all things Islam has brought shame upon our country. Of course, that is not an impeachable offense; however, why not begin with the fact that he was allowed to run as a Candidate for the Office of President, without first presenting his records and a few books written by "ghost" writers is not considered "Records" of a potential candidate.
The most recent apologies to our enemies for a mistaken Koran burning caused the deaths of 30 people, by outraged Muslims in Afghanistan and 6 of the dead are American soldiers. American soldiers, many who have spent more than one tour in Iraq and Afghanistan, war-weary but doing their best to fight to keep America safe, should have been backed by their Commander in Chief. Instead, Obama apologized to the enemy, the Taliban and terrorists, for burning a few books. When will Obama understand that burning a book is not worthy of death - deaths that came from the hands of America's enemies. Obama's apology did one thing: it enraged the Muslims all the more, for they now felt they had just cause for killing our troops. Where's all that "tolerance" Obama speaks of when he demands "tolerance" from non-Muslims?
And now, we read that an American soldier had a complete breakdown and killed 16 Afghanistan citizens. This is not normal, never happened in the 10 plus years of fighting America's enemies and not being a psychiatrist, no one can determine why the soldier acted contrary to normal behavior. Mr Karzai demands an "investigation" and sure enough, President Obama and Penatta expressed their "profound regret" over this incident. The "incident" is regrettable and whatever was the "last straw" for the American soldier is regrettable!
What if this soldier was shocked by the recent uprising of the Muslims throughout Afghanistan, all due to the burning of a few books? What if his "breakdown" occurred after knowing that 6 of his fellow soldiers were murdered by the very hands of trained-by-America's finest - America's so-called "friends", who acted like rabid animals and killed our troops; and he then hears his Commander in Chief apologize to these very same murders. Would that be enough for one man to believe that while he's fighting the "good" fight, he is betrayed by his own President? Could that be a reason for a breakdown? And, what if while fighting the Taliban terrorists, he learns that his President is releasing 5 Taliban terrorists from Gitmo to Afghanistan. Would that be the final straw that broke the camel's back and cause one American soldier to have a breakdown?
War is hell - just ask any one who has ever fought to defend America. Pick a war, any war and all were HELL for the soldier. And when a President begins apologizing to the enemy, releasing Taliban terrorists, it is past time to bring the troops home! The war is over! Afghanistan will be ruled by the Taliban, and Iran will soon enough control Iraq. .... End of story!
The deaths of over 7,000 American troops in a ten year war that eventually is turned back into the hands of the Taliban and al-Qaeda, and a corrupt Afghanistan government is enough to bring about a breakdown to every single American.
God bless the American troops in Afghanistan