The Muslim Brotherhood’s official news outlet, Ikhwan Online
Who are you going to believe?
From Ha'aretz on Friday:
From Israel HaYom today:
From Ha'aretz on Friday:
The Muslim Brotherhood gave the United States assurances regarding the maintaining of Egypt's peace deal with Israel, a top U.S. official said on Thursday, despite recent comments by party leaders claiming that the 1979 treaty did not bind Cairo's new regime.
From Israel HaYom today:
Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood on Saturday denied remarks made by U.S. State Department Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland that the Islamist group made guarantees to the U.S. that it would continue to respect Egypt's peace treaty with Israel.The truth? Egypt simply cannot risk the billions of dollars it receives from the US every year, so the Muslim Brotherhood will do the minimum necessary to appease the US while dismantling every discernible manifestation of an actual peace with Israel.
In an interview over the weekend with the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper, the deputy head of the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party, Essam Arian, said, "We never promised that we would honor the peace treaty with Israel. The treaty is not sacred and we can and should make changes in it."
Another senior member of the party told the London-based newspaper Asharq Alawsat, "The movement's position is not to recognize the Zionist entity and not to recognize peace agreements with hostile entities, and this position will never change."
___________________________
AND, ..... to help the Obama administration present its case to continually "gift" to the Muslim Brotherhood, here's another article worth reading, by Barry Rubin, posted on PJ Media:
Such a “Great” Idea It Can Now Be Proclaimed But Not Criticized: Obama Supports the Muslim Brotherhood
AND ...latest on the Muslim Brotherhood, posted by Pat Dollard:
Hamas: Muslim Brotherhood’s Egyptian Elections Victory Puts Israel’s Security In Peril
Are you all connecting the dots to Obama's Middle East choices - which weaken the U.S. foreign policies and ability to stand with our allies, while he chooses over and over again, to stand with our enemies. Does this give even a slight appearance that this president is concerned for the security/safety of the U.S. and its allies?
I understand and agree, that America's economy (or lack thereof) is the key issue during the GOP debates; however, if we do not have a strong military and foreign policy, we may not be around to worry about our economy, if this administration insists on aiding and abetting the enemy.
