NeoEarth

  

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

SYRIA: BREAKING NEWS! and VIDEO: How Wounded journalist evacuated from Syria

Helicopters fire on Syrians as siege intensifies, activists say

updated 11:58 AM EST, Wed February 29, 2012


(CNN) -- Helicopter gunships fired on civilians Wednesday in the besieged neighborhood of Baba Amr as Syria's intensifying campaign triggered fears among residents that a full-fledged ground invasion could be imminent, opposition activists said.
Baba Amr, in the opposition stronghold of Homs, was also under its heaviest shelling yet and ground troops advanced in al Hakura, in the old part of the neighborhood.
While helicopters have flown over the area in previous days, Wednesday marked the first time they fired at people on the ground, two opposition activists in Baba Amr said.
Violent clashes between the regime's army and the opposition's Free Syrian Army lasted hours, opposition activists said.
Numerous neighborhoods in Homs were under violent attacks and explosions that shook the area, including al Khalidiya, al Bayada, Karm al Zaytoun, Bab Sbaa and others, an opposition activist said.
There was a water, electricity, and communications outage and a crippling blockade by the regime's battalions on the neighborhoods, the activist said.
France said it was trying to evacuate its two nationals stranded in Homs, in coordination with Syrian authorities and the Red Crescent. "We expect the government of Damascus to meet all the conditions for a safe and rapid evacuation, including an immediate cease-fire on Baba Amr," French Foreign Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero told CNN.
Syrian state-run news agency SANA, which consistently blames the violence on "armed terrorist groups" reported on violence in Homs as well. One such "terrorist group" killed a nurse at a hospital, while another attacked a water plant in the Homs countryside, SANA said.
Violence also raged in other parts of the country.
A 13-year-old boy was killed by sniper fire in the eastern city of Deir Ezzor, said the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an opposition activist group.
And an undisclosed number of people were killed and injured by rockets falling on the western city of Rastan, the group said.
Meanwhile, in the Damascus suburb of Zabadani, Syrian forces stormed residential buildings searching for and detaining men ages 13 and above, said an opposition activist named Mostapha.
CNN and other media outlets cannot independently verify opposition or government reports because Syria has severely limited access to the country by foreign journalists. But the vast majority of reports from the ground indicate that government forces are killing citizens in an attempt to eliminate those seeking President Bashar al-Assad's ouster.



UN: Death Toll In Syria Repression Crosses 7,500 Mark



No NATO role in Syria, Rasmussen says






WikiLeak Dump Shines Light On Democrats Stuffing Ballot Boxes, Bribes, and Russian $$$



From PIC

Democrats have been rigging elections and committing fraud for decades. It is also not surprising that Obama, and his operatives, are involved. The Wikileak’s dump shines light onto the ballot stuffing that happened in Ohio and Philadelphia (isn’t that where the Black Panther goons were intimidating poll workers and voters?) and paid a bribe to Jesse Jackson to keep his constantly flapping mouth shut. It also details the Obama team accepting Russian money (Obama has done a lot to help Russia).

From Wikileaks:

To: secure@stratfor.com

Subject: Insight – The Dems & Dirty Tricks ** Internal Use Only – Pls Do

Not Forward **

** Internal Use Only – Pls Do Not Forward **

1) The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to “out”.
2) It appears the Dems “made a donation” to Rev. Jesse (no, they would never do that!) to keep his yap shut after his diatribe about the Jews and Israel. A little bird told me it was a “nice six-figure donation”. This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.

3) The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.Many people have no clue about Stratfor but they are on of the best intelligence gatherers and several government agencies use their services. I subscribe to them and get updates about what’s happening worldwide. I guess now that these e-mails have been “outed” we will being to learn more about what the Democrats did and what ties this has to Obama. Let’s look at what the e-mails expose:...... Keep Reading

Media Partners in Crime with WikiLeaks? - The Canada Free Press.

 "Wikileaks has published two days ago "Israeli commandos, along with Kurdish forces
And they destroyed several underground installations - ground that are used for 
defense and nuclear projects of Iran".  No Israeli official refers to it and you
can doubt this, but the source of Wikileaks is an American intelligence company.

If this individual's opinion is correct and the "source of Wikileaks is an  American 
Intelligence" organization, is it any wonder that our allies cannot trust
this administration with information that would harm their own international 
security? .... just wondering!

Israel tells Obama 'no warnings'

ISRAEL MATZAV   

Tuesday, February 28, 2012





A US intelligence official has told the Associated Press that Israeli officials have told the Obama administration that Israel will not give any advance warning to the United States in the event that Israel decides to attack Iran.
Israeli officials said that if they eventually decide a strike is necessary, they would keep the Americans in the dark to decrease the likelihood that the US would be held responsible for failing to stop Israel's potential attack. The US has been working with the Israelis for months to persuade them that an attack would be only a temporary setback to Iran's nuclear program.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak delivered the message to a series of top-level US visitors to the country, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the White House national security adviser and the director of national intelligence, and top US lawmakers, all trying to close the trust gap between Israel and the US over how to deal with Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Netanyahu delivered the same message to all the Americans who have traveled to Israel for talks, the US official said.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive strategic negotiations.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment, and the Pentagon and Office of Director of National Intelligence declined to comment, as did the Israeli Embassy.
To get an idea of how far apart the US and Israel are, watch this interview with Representative Mike Rogers (R-Mi), who is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. The first 2:45 deals with Iran, but there's another minute that deals with Syria, and while it doesn't directly involve Israel, it's also quite interesting.

The bottom line is that Israel no longer trusts the United States, and will not trust the United States so long as Obama is in power. And with good reason.


What could go wrong?


AND


THE TIMES OF ISRAEL   February 28, 2012
US official: Israel won’t warn us before Iran strike

Israeli officials reportedly decide to keep the US in the dark to spare it from blame in the event of a preemptive attack





An anti-aircraft gun position at a nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz, Iran (photo credit: AP/Hasan Sarbakhshian)
An anti-aircraft gun position at a nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz, Iran (photo credit: AP/Hasan Sarbakhshian)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Israeli officials say they won’t warn the US if they decide to launch a preemptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, according to one US intelligence official familiar with the discussions. The pronouncement, delivered in a series of private, top-level conversations, sets a tense tone ahead of meetings in the coming days at the White House and Capitol Hill.

Israeli officials said that if they eventually decide a strike is necessary, they would keep the Americans in the dark to decrease the likelihood that the US would be held responsible for failing to stop Israel’s potential attack. The US has been working with the Israelis for months to persuade them that an attack would be only a temporary setback to Iran’s nuclear program.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak delivered the message to a series of top-level US visitors to the country, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the White House national security adviser and the director of national intelligence, and top US lawmakers, all trying to close the trust gap between Israel and the US over how to deal with Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
Netanyahu delivered the same message to all the Americans who have traveled to Israel for talks, the US official said.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive strategic negotiations.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment, and the Pentagon and Office of Director of National Intelligence declined to comment, as did the Israeli Embassy.
Iran claims its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the International Atomic Energy Agency has raised alarms that its uranium enrichment program might be a precursor to building nuclear weapons. The US has said it does not know whether Tehran has decided to weaponize its nuclear material and put it on a missile or other delivery device.
The secret warning is likely to worry US officials and begin the high level meetings with Israel and the US far apart on how to handle Iran.
But the apparent decision to keep the U.S. in the dark also stems from Israel’s frustration with the White House. After a visit by National Security Adviser Tom Donilon in particular, they became convinced the Americans would neither take military action, nor go along with unilateral action by Israel against Iran. The Israelis concluded they would have to conduct a strike unilaterally — a point they are likely to hammer home in a series of meetings over the next two weeks in Washington, the official said.
Barak will meet with top administration and congressional officials during his visit. Netanyahu arrives in Washington for meetings with President Barack Obama next week.
The behind-the-scenes warning belies the publicly united front the two sides have attempted to craft with the shuttle diplomacy to each other’s capitals.
“It’s unprecedented outreach to Israel to make sure we are working together to develop the plan to deter Iran from developing a nuclear weapon,” and to keep them from exporting terrorism, said Maryland Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee.
He traveled there with the Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican, to meet Israel’s prime minister and defense minister, along with other officials.
“We talked about the fact that sanctions are working and they are going to get a lot more aggressive,” Ruppersberger added.
They also talked about presenting a unified front to Iran, to counter the media reports that the two countries are at odds over how and when to attack Iran.
“We have to learn from North Korea. All those (peace) talks and stalling and they developed a nuclear weapon,” he said. “We are going to send a message, enough is enough, the stalling is over. … All options are on the table.”
“I got the sense that Israel is incredibly serious about a strike on their nuclear weapons program,” Rogers told CNN on Monday. “It’s their calculus that the administration … is not serious about a real military consequence to Iran moving forward.
“They believe they’re going to have to make a decision on their own, given the current posture of the United States,” he added.
U.S. intelligence and special operations officials have tried to keep a dialogue going with Israel, despite the high-level impasse, sharing with them options such as allowing Israel to use U.S. bases in the region from which to launch such a strike, as a way to make sure the Israelis give the Americans a heads-up, according to the U.S. official, and a former U.S. official with knowledge of the communications
Cooperation has improved on sharing of intelligence in the region, according to one current and one former U.S. official. Israel is providing key information on Syria for instance, now that the U.S. has closed its embassy and pulled out both its diplomats and intelligence officials stationed there, the U.S. official said.
AP National Security Writer Anne Gearan contributed to this report.
Dozier can be followed on Twitter (at)kimberlydozier.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.


BOMBSHELL: US IN TALKS TO SWAP JIHAD TERROR SHEIKH OMAR ABDEL RAHMAN ; 49 OTHERS FOR 19 AMERICANS HELD IN EGYPT

ATLAS SHRUGS
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Shocking. This would be the nadir of Obama's craven foreign policy of surrender, releasing the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that killed six people and injured more than a thousand. Treason.
OmarSanta2.jpgAbout to get a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card?
Al-Arabiya is reporting, in Arabic only so far, that the U.S. is talking with the Egyptian government to free the blind Sheikh and 49 other Egyptians currently imprisoned in the U.S. in exchange for the freedom of the 19 Americans the Egyptians are holding.
The blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel Rahman, is in prison for his role in masterminding the 1993 World Trade Center jihad terror bombing. If he is freed, it will be the apotheosis of Obama's policy of appeasement toward the Islamic world.
"Omar Abdel Rahman at the head of Egyptian-American swap deal," from al-Arabiya (Arabic), February 28 (thanks to Emad). This is my translation from the Arabic:
The Egyptian government has started real action to respond to a U.S. offer offering to release 50 Egyptians in American prisons, including Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, in return for the release of 19 Americans accused of foreign funding of nongovernmental organizations, as confirmed by Major General Mohamed Hani Zaher, an expert on military research and the fight against international terrorism.
Zaher told the newspaper that the Egyptians need to exploit the weak U.S. position, especially after the conviction of their nationals on charges affecting Egypt's sovereignty over its territory, and not to allow this deal to take place without the agreement of the U.S. administration to release more than 500 Egyptian prisoners in U.S. custody; the Egyptian Foreign Ministry does not know anything about them.
He added that the Egyptian Foreign Ministry asked the Egyptian Embassy in Washington for a list of Egyptian prisoners in the United States of America, and the Egyptian consulate there had already started procedures to account for the number of Egyptian prisoners and detainees in custody on a number of charges in the United States, he said, adding that among the prisoners in the Consulate files was Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the Mufti of Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (the Islamic Group) and currently imprisoned in America....



Torture, Riots, Burnt Korans: One Afghan Jail’s Dark History

By  
February 28, 2012 |  
DANGER ROOM
Former war commander Gen. David Petraeus tours the Detention Center in Parwan, 2010. Photo: ISAF

When the U.S. military overhauled its huge detention center at Afghanistan’s Bagram Air Field in 2009, it swore the prison wouldn’t be an embarrassment for Washington anymore. But the burning of the Koran at the prison last week, an error that may have jeopardized the entire war, indicates that 10 years of wartime detentions pose problems that cosmetic changes can’t resolve.
Military spokespeople rarely say outright that the Koran burning took place at the jail. Official statements more often say instead that it took place at “Bagram” or at an unspecified location in “Parwan,” as if the U.S. doesn’t want to recognize the connection between what the military calls an accidental incinerationand its Afghan mega-prison.
Which is ironic. The detention center is indeed located on Bagram Air Field, although visitors have to be driven to the base’s outskirts to view it. But when the U.S. rebooted the prison, it didn’t want any verbal associations with Bagram, which had become associated with lawless, opaque detentions and outright torture; you were supposed to call it the Detention Facility in Parwan, for Parwan Province. Subtext: This Is Not Bagram.
The reason was simple. At least two detainees were beaten to death at Bagram in the early years of the war; a documentary was even made about it. More recently, rumors circulated throughout Afghanistan that a secret torture chamber, called the “Black Jail,” still existed at Bagram. A former Navy SEAL, Vice Adm. Robert Harward, took charge of overhauling detention operations for Gen. Stanley McChrystal, then the commander of the war, and he concluded he needed a whole new prison to signify a clean break.
So the U.S. spent $60 million building a new wartime jail, opening its doors to its unwilling denizens in late 2009. Its former warden, Brig. Gen. Mark Martins, took me on a tour that August. He took pride in the gardens and sewing machines on the premises where detainees could learn horticultural or tailoring skills that could help them earn a peaceful living. The Detention Facility at Parwan was heavy on communal living, a subtle rebuke of the military’s previous reliance on isolating detainees.
It earned praise from some of the critics of the old Bagram jail. The Red Cross said it had “routine” access to detainees at Parwan. Others fretted to me about insufficient due process for the detainees, but considered Parwan an improvement over the old jail.
The U.S. liked the detention center so much, it decided to keep it for a while. Last month, it backed off a plan to turn Parwan to the Afghans, who it said weren’t yet ready to run the jail professionally. Then it signed a $35 million contract to expand it massively, building living quarters that can hold 2,000 detainees, double Parwan’s current size and dwarfing the approximately 180 detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
That gargantuan size laid bare a truth that cuts against the Obama administration’s narrative of a war that’s winding down. The longer the U.S. fights in Afghanistan, the more detainees it will have to hold. And running a huge detention center is a complex task, with considerations that stretch far beyond avoiding torture.
One of those considerations may be responsible for the Koran burning. Guards at detention centers typically try to control how inmates communicate. Illicit messages are often suspect. While it’s by no means clear yet what actually led to the incineration, one leading theory is that detainees were using Korans from the Parwan prison’s library to pass each other notes. That may — repeat: may — have led to guards destroying material from the library; the official explanation thus far is that the guards didn’t know the Korans were included in the pile of books and papers slated to go up in smoke.
It’ll take the conclusion of the NATO’s official investigation to know for sure. On Monday, a spokesman, Navy Capt. John Kirby, told reporters he didn’t know when the inquiry would wrap up, although Pentagon reporters were told it would be done by month’s end later this week. It’s also unclear if the inquiry will recommend any changes to detention operations, in addition to the narrower question of how to dispose of Korans.
The war’s commander, Marine Gen. John Allen, has ordered all his troops to undergo re-training in how to handle religious materials with respect. But it may not just be a respect issue. While U.S. troops can certainly exercise common sense about the Koran, the pressures of running a giant military detention center for years to come may not be getting similar scrutiny. If they don’t, no amount of rebranding may save the Afganistan war.



Obama, Iran in Secret Nuclear Deal - by Reza Kahlili, DC





February 28, 2012

My sources inside Iran tell me that President Obama, seeking to protect the recovering U.S. economy and bolster his chances of being re-elected in November, apparently has entered into an informal agreement with Iran that he believes will defuse the nuclear weapons crisis and keep Israel from attacking the Islamic regime.

The agreement calls for the United States to acknowledge that Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons, and for Iran to hand over its highly enriched uranium, which is necessary for nuclear weaponization.

Iran, for its part, though engaging Obama, has no intention of abiding by the agreement and is stepping up its nuclear enrichment program clandestinely, even as it prepares for a war it believes it can win.

When Obama took office in 2009, he threw out the Bush administration’s aggressive posture in negotiating with Iran and instead sought a new approach, one of diplomacy and friendship. He had a golden opportunity to support millions of Iranians who took to the streets over Iran’s fraudulent elections that June, but instead turned his back on freedom and democracy while believing that negotiations with the Islamic regime would yield results.

Once the protests had died down, the Iranians, after months of promises, announced that a proposed agreement by the West that limited their nuclear activity was no longer acceptable and that they had successfully enriched uranium to 20 percent, which is nine-tenths of the way to nuclear weaponization.

The Iranians have now expanded their nuclear program to the point where they not only have enough low-enriched uranium for six nuclear bombs but also have doubled their stock of highly enriched uranium of 20 percent. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recently reported that Iran has added 3,000 more centrifuges to the Natanz facility, bringing the total to 9,000, and has started enriching to 20 percent at the previous secret site, the Fordow facility, which is deep within a mountain and secure against any attack. Such production could give Iran weapons-grade uranium for nuclear bombs within weeks.

Obama knows that Israel is losing patience with the lack of progress over Iran’s unabated continuation of its illicit nuclear program despite four sets of U.N. sanctions and other sanctions imposed by the U.S. and the European Union. He also knows that any confrontation between Israel and Iran will drag America into an unwanted war and therefore destabilize the American economy and harm his chances of re-election.

Iran knows that its best chance to delay any attack on its nuclear and military facilities and its best opportunity to be in a win-win situation is to once again engage Obama, believing he is weak, that Iran holds the key to his re-election and that a Republican win in November could mean direct confrontation

As revealed in January, Obama sent a message to the Iranian leaders through three different channels. Part of it, disclosed by the Iranian officials, reflected a message by the U.S. president asking for cooperation and negotiation based on mutual interests, but more importantly, it assured Iran that America will not take any action against the Islamic regime.

Sources within Iran reveal that Khamenei, in a secret meeting with his top officials and military commanders, has issued a directive to push for a step-by-step Russian proposal to defuse the crisis in which Iran would only hand over its 20 percent enrichment stock while keeping all low-enriched uranium stock (enough for six nuclear bombs) and cooperate more with the IAEA (all the while continuing its enrichment activity). In exchange, the West would ease up on the sanctions as each step is taken.

The U.S., for its part, had to announce that Iran is not after the nuclear bomb, backing Israel into a corner and pressuring it not to take any action.

In the same meeting it was decided that if the West did not take the offer, then a limited war in the region could help the Iranian leaders further consolidate power at home, incite further uprisings in the region, become the leader of the Islamic movement by attacking Israel and still save some of its nuclear facilities, which are either at secret locations or deep underground. And that would justify their pursuit of the nuclear bomb.

The Obama administration responded positively. First, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsy, publicly announced that Iran is a rational actor and that it is not after a nuclear bomb. Then, just as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was to arrive in Washington for talks with Obama over Iran’s nuclear program, the consensus of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies said Iran has already stopped efforts to build a bomb.

This despite the most recent IAEA report clearly indicating the military aspect of the Iranian nuclear program and last week’s announcement by the U.N. nuclear agency that Iran has ramped up by 50 percent its production of highly enriched uranium, well beyond what is normally needed for peaceful nuclear energy.

In response to the Americans meeting Khamenei’s demands, the Iranian supreme leader responded by publicly announcing that Iran has never sought and will never seek nuclear weapons as it regards possession of such weapons a great sin.

Other Iranian officials did their part by announcing that the cooperation with the IAEA will continue to once again show the world that claims of Iran wanting a nuclear bomb are unfounded.

In this high-stakes game, Iranian leaders believe Obama is hamstrung by politics, and even if war comes, ultimately Russia and China will intervene to support Iran, demanding a cease-fire and therefore giving Iran a victory similar to the outcome of the 2006 Hezbollah-Israel war.

Though an election year, Obama must know that radicals ruling Iran, if given time, will obtain nuclear weapons, changing the world as we know it forever, no matter who is in the White House come 2013.

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and the author of the award-winning book, A Time to Betray. He is a senior fellow with EMPact America, a member of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and teaches at the U.S. Department of Defense’s Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy (JCITA).

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/27/obama-iran-in-secret-nuclear-deal/#ixzz1ni4d2FDq
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/27/obama-iran-in-secret-nuclear-deal/#ixzz1ni4WGYwg


Posted by Ted Belman @ 10:23 pm | 5 Comments »

NOTE:
1.  Please visit Israpundit to read comments and/or post a comment.

2.  Read this, posted on The Christian Science Monitor: 

Reports: Netanyahu will push Obama hard on Iran

Iran nuclear program: 5 key sitesBut White House officials say Netanyahu will go home empty-handed. The Los Angeles Times reports that Obama has no intention of making any policy shift toward Iran and that he believes the current US strategy – diplomacy and increasingly strict sanctions – is taking a toll on Iran.
 
“A more explicit military threat is not helpful,” senior White House officials told The Times. WhileWashington's red line is Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb,Israel's threshold is lower: Iran merely acquiring the knowledge and industrial means to build a nuclear bomb.
 
There are several countries who have the capability to build a nuclear weapon but have never tried, it reports, and Pentagon and intelligence officials have said that they do not believe Iran has decided to build a bomb. ..... read more