Breaking: Is U.S. Government Harassing Walid Shoebat?

 

 

 

  Watch this at WRKO

Obama’s Brother Malik Obama Tied to Muslim Brotherhood

Breaking: Is U.S. Government Harassing Walid Shoebat?

by Shoebat Foundation 

on September 13, 2013 

Today, Walid appeared on the Kuhner Report with Jeffrey Kuhner with some breaking news. Before getting to that, Kuhner asked Walid to talk about why he believes the Syrian rebels are responsible for the Chemical weapons attacks. The subject eventually moved to Obama’s family in general, and Malik Obama in particular. Regular readers to our site are quite familiar with what we’ve uncovered;it is irrefutable.

Jeffrey Kuhner

That leads to the explosive part of the interview. A couple of weeks ago, we were contacted by a representative with The Blaze. We were told that a representative of the Obama administration was attempting to dismiss Walid’s translation of Tahani Al-Jebali, a former Egyptian Constitutional Court judge, who asserted that Barack Obama’s brother is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The representative from The Blaze informed us of this and kindly gave us the opportunity to respond. We did so by sending a link to a CNN International report that backed up Walid’s claims. Again, regular readers to our site will understand the sweet irony of this one.

In any event, be sure to listen to this interview (video-top of page) as Walid goes into detail about why he believes he’s being harassed, likely by the U.S. Government and why he believes our work on Malik Obama may very well be the reason.

Is it a good thing to be afflicted with Islamophobia? Get the new book from Walid Shoebat, The Case FOR ISLAMOPHOBIA: Jihad by the Word; America’s Final Warning.

Via WRKO:

http://shoebat.com/2013/09/13/breaking-u-s-government-harassing-walid-shoebat/

In Kerry-Lavrov Syrian chemical accord scant punishment. Assad is free to pursue war

Bee's note:  Here's my prediction:  This US-Russian Geneva Agreement will be as successful as the Oslo Agreements between the PLO/Fatah and Israel.  Stay tuned ....!

DEBKAfile Special Report September 14, 2013, 7:23 PM (IDT)

The framework accord for destroying Syria’s chemical stockpiles, which US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov announced at a news conference in Geneva Saturday, Sept 14, covers important ground - but leaves even more important issues unaddressed. Its implementation depends on the full cooperation of Bashar Assad and his army for securing the process. He is therefore assured of staying in power and free to wage war unhindered.

This assurance was incorporated in Kerry’s words that the agreement can end the chemical threat to the Syrian people, its neighbors and the region only “if fully implemented.”

The US Secretary listed the six points of that accord:

1. It included a shared assessment of the amounts and types of Syrian regime’s chemical weaopons stockpiles.
DEBKAfile: Earlier reports spoke of a 40-percent disparity between the US and Russian assessments.
2. The Syrian regime has one week until Sept. 21 to submit a comprehensive listing, including names, types and quantities of its chemical weapons agents, types of munitions and local and foreign storage, production and research and development facilities.
The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons-OPCW, which usually allows 30 days, has agreed to extraordinary procedures to assure the inspection and destruction of all CW stocks.
3. Inspectors must be on the ground by November and the destruction of CW completed by mid-2014.
--- On this point, the Russian foreign minister was less specific: Implementation of the agreed framework for the removal and destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons must be supported by an “OPCW investigation and a Security Council resolution,” he said, indicating a process of several months.
DEBKAfile: This timeline could stretch out even longer because of the technical difficulties of destroying not just stocks but also manufacturing plant and the facilities for mixing and loading the chemical and biological agents on weapons of delivery.
4. Syria must provide immediate and unfettered access to its CW sites.
5. All CW including stocks inside and outside Syria must be surrendered and destroyed on-site, or if necessary outside the country.
6. Non-compliance would entail the approval of Article 7 of the UN charter which provides for legally binding military or non-military sanctions.

Lavrov’s version

--- On this point, too, Lavrov elaborated on Moscow’s position: Violations must be first investigated and confirmed by the OPCW before coming before the UN Security Council for a new resolution mandating “concrete measures.” These may not entail military action, said the Russian foreign minister, “which would be catastrophic.”
Although this word was not mentioned, the accord leaves Moscow free to use its veto once again to bar punitive action against Syria.
In answer to a reporter’s question, Kerry later insisted that the Syrian regime would be held fully accountable for non-compliance with its commitments and the US president retained the power and right to pursue military measures ““commensurate with the [Syrian ruler’s] level of accountability” without UN approval if diplomacy failed to achieve its end.

At the same time, the US secretary allowed that the US and Russians were agreed that Syria would be disarmed of its chemical weapons by diplomatic, not military, means.
Lavrov departed from Kerry’s presentation of their accord on more points:

a) All chemical weapons must be destroyed – not just those in the hands of the Assad regime, but also the Syrian rebels. This laid the groundwork for the Syrian ruler to delay compliance by pointing a finger at Israel.b)  Military action against Syria was ruled out a priori.c)  The Russian-US accord on Syria’s chemical weapons must lead to an international conference to discuss the declaration of the Middle East as a region free of weapons of mass destruction, which is Moscow’s ultimate aim.This supported Assad’s stipulation which has made his implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention contingent on Israel ratifying  the CWC which it signed in 1993, as a step on the road to demanding its  nuclear disarmament.Secretary Kerry made no comments on this point.d)  The US will contribute the funding and other resources for destroying Syria’s chemical weapons, and ask other world powers to participate.

More omissions

While the US secretary repeatedly praised President Vladimir Putin for initiating Syria’s handover of chemical weapons, Lavrov omitted to reciprocate with commendations of President Barack Obama.

DEBKAfile’s intelligence and military sources see five conspicuous omissions in the way of the “full implementation” of the US-Russian Geneva Agreement:

--- The timeline is left open. In none of his speeches and interviews did President Obama set deadlines for the eradication of Syria’s poison chemicals, and the dates set by Kerry Saturday in Geneva are unrealistic.

---  Russia and the Syrian ruler were left with the impression that Obama has opted against bringing Assad to account for using chemical weapons in order to keep his war afloat from a position of strength. Indeed the US president appears not to be averse to letting him stay in power.
Neither Kerry nor Lavrov answered the reporter who asked simply: “Why didn’t you first of all try and stop the war?"
---  Notwithstanding the impression Kerry tried to convey at the news conference, Obama has clearly discarded the military option as a means of keeping Assad under pressure to comply with his commitment to dismantle his chemical weapons. Even if Washington decided to invoke Article 7 to punish Syria for non-compliance with the accord, the Russian veto still hangs over this step.
---  Rescued from an  imminent American military threat, the Syria ruler is free to surrender only a small part of his chemical resources and, with the support of his Russian and Iranian allies, hold back sufficient poison gas to save himself if he risks losing the war.

He can continue to ignore the evidence found by US intelligence agencies that the Syrian army was guilty of using chemical weapons against civilians in Homs, Aleppo and Idlib – even before the poison gas massacre of Aug. 21 east of Damascus.

When on April 24, Brig. Gen. Itay Brun, head of Israeli Military Intelligence research stated publicly: "We have recently detected the Syrian army’s repeated use of lethal chemical weapons, apparently sarin,” the White House in Washington was up in arms and made Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon promise that such slips of the tongue would not recur.

Sunday, Sept. 15, Secretary Kerry is expected in Israel for a one-day trip.

He faces two uphill tasks: He must convince Israel that there is no danger of Syrian chemical weapons being passed to the Lebanese Hizballah and so diverted from international control; and that the US-Russian deal on Syria is not a template for letting Tehran off the hook on its nuclear program. That is the foremost of Israel’s concerns.

http://www.debka.com/article/23279/In-Kerry-Lavrov-Syrian-chemical-accord-scant-punishment-Assad-is-free-to-pursue-war

UPDATE:

« Breaking News »

Kerry is due in Israel Sunday 

DEBKAfile September 14, 2013, 7:56 PM (GMT+02:00)

US Secretary of State John Kerry has a date with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu Sunday to report on the accord he reached in Geneva with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Syrian chemical weapons.

He then flies to Paris to meet the British and French foreign ministers, William Hague and Lauren Fabius.

DEBKAfile:  US Secretary of State John Kerry will be coming with words of assurance for Netanyahu. Israel is deeply concerned by a sense that the Obama administration has sold out the Syrian rebels and saved Bashar Assad in a deal with Moscow. 

No one in Jerusalem trusts Assad’s pledge to give up his chemical weapons, certain he will surrender no more than a portion to international control and conceal the rest.

http://www.debka.com/newsupdatepopup/5731/

Why Israelis See Shi'ite Axis as a Greater Threat Than Syrian Jihadis

THE INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT
by Yaakov Lappin
Special to IPT News
September 10, 2013

A vital debate is raging in the United States over a key question: Does the Assad regime pose a greater threat to international security than the radical Islamist elements fighting to topple the Syrian dictator? And how would a military strike alter the balance?

As Congress debates the merits of military action in Syria, concerns are being raised by some observers that hurting the Assad regime could strengthen the al-Qaida-affiliated groups, thereby doing more harm than good to regional and global security.

During these tumultuous and chaotic times in the Middle East, it is more difficult than ever to assemble and update an accurate, comprehensive threat assessment picture, one which takes into account both near and distant dangers, and which can distinguish between security problems based on their level of severity.

There is not one uniform view among Israeli defense experts over what outcome would be best for Israel, in light of the fact that no one can know with certainty what will come in Assad's place.

Most observers agree that from Israel's perspective, the al-Qaida-affiliated organizations in Syria pose a very real and growing threat, but one which is significantly smaller in scope and more easily contained than the threat posed by a far more powerful axis: Iran, the Assad regime, and Hizballah.

This view is based on the fact that the Syrian regime forms a central component in the Iranian bloc. It is this bloc, on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons, and with access to unconventional weapons and state-sponsored conventional weaponry, that is the No. 1 threat to Israel's security.

Syria is the bridge connecting Tehran to Hizballah in Lebanon. Bashar Al-Assad has brought Syria closer to Iran and Hizballah, and today relies on them for his survival. Assad is facilitating the transit of advanced Iranian arms to Hizballah, as well as supplying it with Syrian-made weapons.

Syria is viewed by the Iranian regime as its critical forward base and springboard to eventual regional domination.

With Syrian help, Iran has armed Hizballah with 70-80,000 rockets that are pointed at Israeli cities. Hizballah's firepower has the potential to paralyze the Israeli home front in a future war.

The most critical threat is the Iranian nuclear weapons program, which is edging forward all the time.

If Iran isn't stopped, Hizballah, and other terrorist semi-states like Hamas in Gaza, could try to attack Israel while enjoying protection from an Iranian nuclear umbrella.

The same pattern can repeat itself on an even larger scale in the future. Iranian-sponsored terrorist networks might attack Western cities with impunity if they are emboldened by a nuclear-armed Iran.

The collapse of the Assad regime would deal a serious blow to Tehran and Hizballah, while significantly improving Israel's strategic situation.

Furthermore, a Syrian regime that is only weakened by a U.S. strike, yet deterred from deploying a chemical weapon again, could in turn deter the entire Iranian network, and give Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khameini pause before considering further progress on his nuclear program.

According to former military intelligence chief Amos Yadlin,"Iran has all of the capabilities it needs to decide to create a nuclear weapon. The day of the decision could be tonight, when they might choose to break out of the Non-Proliferation Treaty."

U.S. influence and deterrence has never been more needed in the region, and it has never been more lacking.

If Iran, the world's most radical state – whose leaders have publicly declared their desire to see Israel destroyed – gets hold of humanity's most destructive weapons, the effect on regional security would be devastating.

Sunni Arab countries, made up of Gulf states and secular countries like Jordan and Egypt, are all deeply concerned about the potential of nuclear weapons in the hands of Shi'ite Iran.

It is impossible to divorce Syria's use of chemical weapons from the Iranian nuclear weapons program. The Islamic Republic's Revolutionary Guards Corps is assisting the Syrian army against the rebels, while thousands of Hizballah fighters are in Syria too, fighting alongside Assad's forces.

The Iranian-led axis views Syria as a battleground where it can experiment with unconventional weapons and push the boundaries on international prohibitions against weapons of mass destruction.

An indecisive response to August's chemical massacre in Damascus runs the risk of emboldening Iran and its allies. They in turn will continue in their scheme to emerge as leaders of the Muslim Middle East, acquire nuclear weapons, and confront Israel and the moderate Sunni states.

None of these concerns negate the dangers from a revitalized al-Qaida network in Syria.

Estimates vary about the number of radical Islamists among opposition fighters. The fact remains that jihadi groups are growing quickly there. They make up some of the most effective fighting units, and are thriving in the power vacuum and deadly battlegrounds of Syria.

The jihadi presence in Syria has begun infecting neighboring states too, such as Lebanon and Iraq, and is likely to spread to other territories experiencing power vacuums, like Egypt's troubled Sinai Peninsula, while threatening stable countries such as Jordan. A spillover of terrorists to other lands is inevitable.

While the Sunni radical threat is very real, it is also limited in scope at this time, as far as Israel is concerned.

Small terrorist groups can fire rockets and mortars at Israel, and launch cross-border attacks. But this is a threat the IDF can contain, and for which it has spent many months preparing.

In contrast, a war with the Iranian axis would take on a significantly higher magnitude.

When weighing the extent of the danger presented by pro-al-Qaida groups in Syria, one might also factor in the likelihood that they will be engaged in a power struggle, sectarian warfare, and battles with more moderate elements of the Free Syrian Army for years to come.

This subsequent conflict could hamper their ability to organize serious attacks.

To be sure, the security problem posed by jihadis is no laughing matter. As they continue to raid weapons storehouses once owned by the Syrian army, Israel must think ahead about a scenario involving a raid by al-Qaida on a chemical weapons facility controlled by the Assad regime.

A reality in which al-Qaida is armed with chemical weapons can never be accepted.

But right now, Iran is just a few months away from a working nuclear weapon, should it decide to obtain one. Its ally in Damascus massacred over 1,400 civilians with sarin gas, and its ally in Lebanon stockpiles more rockets and missiles than any arsenal in the hands of most modern militaries.

For all of these reasons, a failure to deter the Iran-Syria-Hizballah axis now could result in a future security deterioration, the outcome of which would be more extensive than any immediate threat posed by jihadis in Syria.

Yaakov Lappin is the Jerusalem Post's military and national security affairs correspondent, and author of The Virtual Caliphate (Potomac Books), which proposes that jihadis on the internet have established a virtual Islamist state.

http://www.investigativeproject.org/4156/why-israelis-see-shiite-axis-as-a-greater-threat

Bee's Note:

1. “Assad is scattering the chemical weapons arsenal across Syria”

2. Obama welcomes Syrian chemical weapons agreement

3. Pain in the Assad, Continued  Syria won’t follow through on chemical weapons compliance unless we stay ready to strike.

4. Syria Conflict Breathes New Life Into Al-Qaeda

5. Charles Krauthammer: 'Obama Has Been Played' Like A Fiddle

"Charles Krauthammer slammed Barack Obama’s “epically incompetent” handling of Syria, Thursday – one day after Russian President Vladimir Putin published a dismissive op-ed in the New York Times.
“Here is the president of the greatest democracy on Earth, being lectured — insultingly, really — in an American newspaper about human rights, about international law, about the protection of the elderly and children in wartime.”
Krauthammer added that the only thing that makes Obama’s beat-down and subsequent lecture more humiliating is that they came at the hands of a former “KGB thug.”
“What we are seeing here is Putin so confident of himself… that he could actually engage in this. It’s an index of how, sort of, Obama has been played and continues to be right now in Geneva.”
Speaking of Obama being played, the Wall Street Journal is reporting this morning that a secretive Syrian military unit at the center of the Assad regime’s chemical weapons program has been moving stocks of poison gases and munitions to as many as 50 sites to make them harder for the U.S. to track, according to American and Middle Eastern officials.
Yes, Dr. Krauthammer, Barack Obama is being played indeed. Sadly – and ominously – the game has just begun."

 http://www.ijreview.com/2013/09/78920-charles-krauthammer-obama-played/

6. 

7.

.

Obama Finds Benefits After Being Taken to the Cleaners
A recent photo has emerged capturing Barack Obama and his foreign policy staff being happily assisted by a new found friend and ally after they had recently been taken to his cleaners, so that he may continue to look good and shine as the premier leader on the worlds stage. (h/t Jack WV)

8. And, lastly, if it were not so sad, it would be funny, quote of the week:

Jay Carney says Americans ‘appreciate’ a president who can’t make a decision

State could have fired employees over Benghazi attack, says Pickering

THE HILL
By Julian Pecquet - 09/14/13 06:00 AM ET

The State Department could have fired two employees over last year’s terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, the chairman of the independent panel that investigated the crime told The Hill.

“Our report recommended two people should leave their jobs, nothing more, nothing less,” former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, the chairman of the Accountability Review Board, told The Hill in an e-mail.

Asked if that meant firing or reassignment, he said “either,” but that it was “up to the Department of State.”

“We left open their staying on in the Department,” Pickering said.

The department instead announced last month that it has reassigned the two employees, along with two others who were also faulted by the panel but weren't singled out for disciplinary action.

That decision is expected to come under stark criticism next week when the House rekindles its Benghazi investigation following the first anniversary of the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans last Sept. 11.

Pickering's comments mark the first public suggestion that two of them could have been fired as a result of Benghazi. The ARB report, released in December, faulted “systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies” at high levels of the State Department for inadequate security at the U.S. mission.

The ARB stopped short of officially recommending disciplinary action, however, because it lacked the authority to do so absent a finding of “breach of duty.” The State Department has repeatedly highlighted that fact to explain its decision not to fire anyone.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/322163-state-could-have-fired-employees-over-benghazi-says-pickering#ixzz2etdbCQzI 
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

The CIA’s Netherworld: Its Underbelly Gutted – Out Of Necessity – By One Of Its Top Agents

The CIA’s Netherworld: Its Underbelly Gutted – Out Of Necessity – By One Of Its Top Agents. Mossad, Sayeret Matkal (Jewish Justice Squads) Featured Too…

Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The notion that clandestine agencies are not necessary to protect a nation’s interests is exceedingly naive and dangerously deluded. As a matter of record, if not for the ‘off the charts’ operations from Israel’s Mossad and Sayeret Matkal, rest assured, the Islamic assassins of Israel’s athletes in Munich would still be breathing. A highly recommended visual aid is embedded herein. In fact, its message should be: this is how it’s done. Jewish justice, Israeli-style.

While most of their operations are unknown – as well they should be, hence, the clandestine part – for whatever reason, some do make it into the public domain. Besides, having had a ‘blood brother’ who was involved with clandestine operations, aside from knowing about his participation in the raid on Entebbe, the rest of his work was never spoken about. With a smile on his face, he remained as tight lipped as a sphinx (not that prodding wasn’t attempted!), regardless of our closeness.

Mossad’s double down mission, hunting down ‘soldiers for Allah, when they struck down Jews in Bulgaria (July 2012), weaves some threads for those unfamiliar with said netherworld.

But even though most operations are eventually taken to the graves of these warriors, some become known. Almost to a perfect hit score, the PLO’s Munich terrorists (by the bye, the same outfit of terrorists – currently incarnated into the PA/Fatah regime – are dressed up/koshered as ‘peace’ partners, yet they never stopped killing Jews/Israelis!) have been duly dispatched to their pagan, Allah. Now, that’s quite a feat of Jewish justice! For some ‘delicious’ tidbits on the ‘eliminations’:

“The soldiers ditched their dinghies and crossed the empty beach to where agents from the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, were waiting for them in three cars. The commandos split up into groups. On their way through the city, they were disguised as couples out for an evening ride in the hills. At a stoplight, Ehud Barak, 31 years old, a future prime minister of Israel, dressed, in a wig and lipstick, as a sassy brunette, smiled at the man in the next car. The light changed and off the man drove. Each of the commandos knew the route by heart, a maze of roads that led through the city to the target: a building on the outskirts, home of two of the leaders of Black September, a splinter group of the P.L.O. that, a few months earlier, at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich, had kidnapped several members of the Israeli Olympic team; 11 were killed.

In the aftermath of this massacre, Golda Meir, the country’s grandmotherly, Wisconsin-raised prime minister, ordered the military to hunt down the members of Black September—a mission undertaken as a matter of deterrence and as a statement of resolve. In those weeks of planning, much of the mission was turned over to Sayeret Matkal, a highly classified special-ops outfit, which is known as “the Unit…..”

But the recounting of this magnificent, brilliantly planned and executed mission is not to suggest that some agents (from whichever intelligence agency, though for this discussion the reference is to western agencies) haven’t turned on their own, if tasked to do so. However, one would think/hope that every person should set (im)moral boundaries they would never cross. Yet, to believe said lines aren’t crossed… Now, onto the CIA and its netherworld….

CIA authors ‘secret key’ unlocks CIA redactions

 Image courtesy of Canada Free Press Please comment on this article at Canada Free Press By Douglas J. Hagmann 23 August 2013: “I was in the belly of the beast.  I began to see the lengths to which the CIA will go to conceal unconstitutional operations, hide information from Congress and silence anyone inside who challenges it.”  Those are the words of Kevin M. Shipp, a former category 1, highly decorated CIA agent who held positions as an agent on the protective detail of the director and deputy director of the CIA, a manager of ongoing operations, an internal Security Officer, a counterintelligence investigator tasked to ferret moles out of the CIA, a Counter Terrorism Center (CTC) officer, a protective operations team leader and a polygraph examiner.

While working to identify moles inside the agency in the wake of the 1994 Aldrich Ames spy scandal, Mr. Shipp uncovered a significant global vulnerability that if left uncorrected, allowed the personal identities of  CIA agents working undercover to be disclosed to our enemies. Every day, every hour that this vulnerability was allowed to remain, the lives of countless undercover agents were in real jeopardy. “The more I looked into this, the worse it became.” Upon concluding his lengthy investigation, he submitted an extremely detailed report of his findings to the top channels of the CIA. In fact, he submitted his explosive findings three times, only to learn that each time the report was “lost” or destroyed, with no record of it existing anywhere within the internal system. It was then he realized that something was terribly wrong. The third time he submitted his findings, he hand carried the report to the highest levels of the CIA. Yet, the hole remained unplugged and the lives of his fellow agents working undercover remained at risk.

At this point, the Inspector General for the Department of State was provided with a copy of his investigative findings. Their investigation concluded that the situation was even worse than initially believed. After an immediate investigation, the findings of Kevin Shipp were verified and the CIA was publicly rebuked for putting lives of its agents at risk. Unfortunately, that’s not the end of the story, but merely the beginning. Kevin M. Shipp, the highly decorated veteran of the CIA who was loyal to the oath he took to the U.S. Constitution to serve and protect his country from enemies, foreign and domestic, and for his efforts to protect the lives of his fellow agents, never anticipated the events that would follow.

As a result of his actions to protect the lives of his fellow agents working undercover throughout the world, he began to receive threatening phone calls from his superiors within the CIA. He was harassed, followed, and his communications were tapped. His professional life was turning into a private hell, and the situation was about to get much worse. It was about to get very personal, and very ugly. Kevin Shipp and his family were relocated to another location within the U.S., and was provided a house for he and his family to reside with this reassignment. After living at this new residence for a few months, his wife and three young children began to become very ill. His son began to bleed from his nose and mouth. Strange bruises and rashes appeared and lingered on his body, symptoms that affected each member of his family. The physical health of his wife and children gradually declined, leaving his wife nearly with severe short term memory loss, bedridden and his children debilitated. Mr. Shipp reported the problem to his superiors, asking… pleading that something be done to identify whatever was causing this sudden sickness. Mr. Shipp asserted that something in the house was making them sick, and asked for an investigation. The CIA refused.

As any loving husband and father would do, Kevin Shipp took his family to several doctors and immunologists for their diagnosis and treatment at his own expense to avoid discovery by the CIA. Once, he flew his son to a specialist, and was shaken by what he was told. He learned that his son and his entire family was exposed to some significant toxin that was damaging their immune systems. Continued exposure would certainly be fatal.

It was at this point that he contacted the FBI, an agency where he had made contacts and friendships. Their investigation, in tandem with biohazard teams inspecting Mr. Shipp’s family home, discovered that the house contained toxic substances that would slowly kill them. In fact, the situation was so bad that a HAZMAT team in full gear emptied their home of all of its furnishings, including every personal item once owed by their family. The contamination was so severe that all of the items, from their memorabilia to the children’s toys had to be removed, contained and destroyed as they watched from a safe distance. They lost everything, including their health.

During this investigation independent of the CIA, the family home remained vacant and closed up, pending further tests and analysis. However, Mr. Shipp was notified by an individual in close proximity to the residence of unusual activity at the house – of a break-in. Using his skills as an agent, Mr. Shipp took measures to record activities inside the residence while the house remained vacant. From those measures, he learned that unidentified individuals gained access to the house again, this time painting a chemical substance on the ceiling of one of the rooms over an area identified as one of the toxic ‘hot spots.’ Somebody, it seemed, wanted Mr. Shipp and his family to die a slow and painful death.

After being professionally marginalized, personally harassed and having his wife and children exposed to lethal levels of toxic substances, Mr. Shipp had enough. He resigned his position within the CIA and decided to fight this from the outside. Upon meeting menacing supervisory agents in Washington, DC when he resigned, he looked them in the eyes and offered this prophetic warning: “The same courage that made me a good CIA agent is the same courage I’m going to use to bring you to justice for what you’ve done to me and my family.” Mr. Shipp retained “a courageous attorney from Texas” who filed suit against the agency to expose the truth of what was taking place.

The harassment, however, did not stop. Mr. Shipp was initially denied his retirement funds, only to have them released  after making it known that their actions constituted a felony. The interest rates on his car loans were raised and the payments skyrocketed, making it all but impossible to keep financially viable. The CIA set out to destroy Mr. Shipp’s reputation, finances and family. Like David facing Goliath, however, Mr. Shipp fought back.

He wrote a book about what happened to his family, only to have the entire book redacted by the CIA pre-publications review board to ridiculous levels. Then, he wrote another book, this time about his experiences within the CIA. Titled From the Company of Shadows, the manuscript went back and forth between the author, publisher and the CIA until it was finally approved, with redactions, of course, after a two-year battle. The most heavily redacted portion of the book is chapter 26, titled ‘Tyranny, The Story of an American Family.’ It was the personal story of everything that he and his family had been forced to endure at the hands of the CIA. The manuscript was approved by the CIA, although they must have forgotten just how well they trained Mr. Shipp.

Although the book was first published in October 2012, it was not until Wednesday, August 21, 2013 that Mr. Shipp publicly disclosed for the first time anywhere on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report that he embedded a code within the book – a code that exposes the redacted information in chapter 26. “The CIA examined every word in every sentence.  After a two year battle, they approved [it] for release.  Unknown to them I built a code into book – exposing the black outs in Chapter 26.  The CIA missed it,” stated Mr. Shipp. “The code exposes the CIA’s use of the State Secrets Privilege to conceal the illness of my wife and children.

There have been other cases in the CIA and cases in the US military where people have been injured or killed because of government negligence, and it has been covered up using secrecy.” “Originally I built the code into the book as a legacy to my wife and children.  I was going to leave the key to them after I was gone, so someday they would have justice for what was done to them.  But, they have been pleading with me for help.  So, I have decided to release it now.  I am taking a significant personal risk to do this.  But they did this to my children.  You don’t mess with a man’s children.”

This author was provided the key to the embedded code – one of a handful of individuals to possess it. Indeed, what is revealed is exactly what has been stated by Mr. Shipp, from what happened to him and his family to every American citizen.  The current intelligence apparatus that was implemented under President George Bush and expanded exponentially under Obama is monitoring virtually all of our activities.

We live in a surveillance state where we now have 1,271 sites located inside the U.S. with a domestic mission, contrary to the charter of the CIA and the United States Constitution. CIA operatives have been inserted into all of the fusion centers to collect information about U.S. citizens. And now, they are exploiting the use using of the States Secrets Privilege operate in the shadows, outside of any oversight, and to silence any inquiry, any lawsuit, anyone in Congress, or any citizen from learning just how expansive their operations are. “The NSA is using the State Secrets Privilege right now to block lawsuits and Congressional inquiry into the NSA spying scandal.  The CIA secrecy agreement and the State Secrets Privilege are being used to silence Benghazi witnesses,” stated Mr. Shipp. We are living in a “post-Constitutional” government.

Note: Mr. Shipp’s book with the embedded code can only be obtained from his website at http://www.kevinmshipp.com (click HERE). The books sold on Amazon do not contain the embedded code.

While both Republican and Demster administrations are guilty of failing to rein in rogue CIA heads, does anyone rationally believe, under John Brennan – the Islamist-leaning CIA Director – that illegal, anti-Constitutional activities have not catapulted into the stratosphere, so to speak? Patriots, come on….

http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/09/14/the-cias-netherworld-its-underbelly-gutted-out-of-necessity-by-one-of-its-top-agents-mossad-sayeret-matkal-jewish-justice-squads-featured-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

Obama Appoints Hamas Supporter who Called Israelis Nazis to Commission on Religious Freedom

Obama Appoints Hamas Supporter who Called Israelis Nazis to Commission on Religious Freedom

September 12, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield

front page magazine

James Zogby called Hezbollah “the Lebanese armed resistance”, defended Hamas supporters and urging understanding Hamas. He was less understanding toward Jews calling Israelis “Nazis” and accusing Israel of perpetrating a Holocaust against the PLO.

A vehement opponent of freedom of speech, Zogby took the Islamist side of the Mohammed cartoon controversy, writing, “To declare, as some have, that such freedom is absolute is, of course, nonsense since every culture, by definition, has its taboos. The measure of a civilization is not the freedom it provides to defile taboos, but how respectful and sensitive it is to the taboos of diverse cultures, especially those within its midst.”

Zogby then implied that cartoons that offend Muslims should be banned.

But then there was this, “At a 2007 Arab American Institute forum, Zogby was cited by then-U.S. Senator Barack Obama as his “good friend,” whose support it was “an honor to have.”

So Zogby’s good friend appointed him to the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom where he can have a ball explaining why Muslim religious freedom requires taking away everyone else’s freedom.

About Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-appoints-hamas-supporter-who-called-israelis-nazis-to-commission-on-religious-freedom/

Democrats Block Resolution to Create Joint Select Committee to Investigate Benghazi

MINUTEMEN NEWS

13 September 2013  

Democrats Block Cruz Resolution to Create Joint Select Committee to Investigate Benghazi Attacks Cruz co-sponsors Cornyn Bill to Designate Fort Hood Shooting as Terrorist Attack 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) has introduced a resolution, S.R. 225, to create a joint select committee to investigate the Benghazi terrorist attacks from one year ago, last September 11, 2012. 

On Wednesday, Sen. Cruz requested unanimous consent to introduce and pass the resolution, but Democrats blocked it from consideration. “On September 11, 2012, four Americans were brutally murdered in a terrorist attack against our embassy in Benghazi and one year later, there has still been no action of reprisal and no justice rendered upon the assailants,” Sen. Cruz said. “

Failure to hold accountable the perpetrators of this vicious attack will leave terrorists around the world with the impression that they can kill Americans and escape the consequences, increasing the likelihood of future attacks. The American people deserve to have a complete account from their government of the events in Benghazi before, during, and after the attack.” 

The Cruz resolution currently has 19 cosponsors including Sens. Vitter, Blunt, Toomey, Paul, Scott, Heller, Lee, Inhofe, Ayotte, Portman, Coburn, Roberts, Risch, Ron Johnson, Isakson, Crapo, Cochran, Grassley and Enzi.

View full text of the resolution here.

Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2013/09/democrats-block-resolution-create-joint-select-committee-investigate-benghazi/#jJhkkYk4IrHjlMKb.99