This blog has made no bones about the immoral and depraved behavior of the Commander-in-Chief, and in too many ways to enumerate. Book-worthy. Rest assured, bashing the POTUS has not been a high point of these pages, as it represents a nadir in the glorious history of a once great nation. Tragic.
The Bamster is also known to enjoy his “blow”, even though he insists it’s a youthful drug dalliance long gone…but the scuttlebutt says otherwise, as he toked while a U.S. Senator too! And when one places the above in sharp relief next to his sexual dalliances, well, then it is “natural” for him to be “incapacitated”, more often than not. Nobody should think this is a whole lot of conspiracy-talk, you just need to go from point A to B and see what secrets shake out.
Subject: SHOCK: Obama was ‘incapacitated’ due to ‘staggering, inapt activities’ between the hours of 1800 and 2300 on the night of Benghazi… | RedFlagNews.com
May 21, 2013
by J.R. Elliott
Two sources close to the inner circle of the Obama White House have communicated exclusively to RedFlag News that during the night of Benghazi, President Obama was ‘incapacitated’ due to ‘staggering, inapt activities’ between the hours of 1800 and 2300.
In light of the clear culture of intimidation by the Obama Administration, our sources are not in any position to come forward; however, they made clear that if the White House Press Corps and other journalist organizations would aggressively pursue all their ‘available contacts within the POTUS bubble’, the ‘most damaging story in American presidential history’ will advance from those higher up who are itching to blow the whistle.
When the average “Joe Blow” indulges in too many highs or otherwise risky monkey business, the result is generally a busted up relationship, possibly some jail time or a stint in rehab. While the wreckage is personally (and familial-wise) devastating, its effects are not of national – and dare this blog suggest – or global import.
23 May 2013: Subsequent to a meeting with my primary source inside the intelligence community last week, an individual I refer to as my “intelligence insider,” I wrote a column titledThe Benghazi deception. Published on Thursday, May 16, 2013, it concerned Barack Hussein Obama’s location and activities on the night of the Benghazi attack when four Americans were murdered during a preplanned attack against a CIA operations compound. My source was extremely emphatic about this particular issue, stating that the Obama administration will never provide a truthful or detailed answer to this question.
“Why,” I asked, “I mean, what could possibly be so damning about his location and activities during the 18 1/2 hour period in question? He was in the White House, correct?” It was here that there was a long, uncomfortable pause as I waited for my answer.
“The White House is a pretty big place, you know,” stated my source in such a way that made it seem that I thought it to be a small, single family home. “I’m telling you, ‘somebody’ in the press will be asking that question and won’t get an answer,” he stated very emphatically. “Just ask the question,” he said, leaving me to wonder momentarily if I was to ask him. “Write about it, and ask the question. Exactly where was Barack Hussein Obama following his 5:00 meeting in the Oval Office until the next day? Where wasn’t he? It’s almost as if the Wizard of Oz himself waved his magic wand to divert attention away from those lost hours. Nobody is asking the question,” he said to me, almost in a scolding manner.
And so I did. I asked the question, using his exact words in my article published last Thursday. What happened within the next 72 hours should also speak to the authenticity of my source.
Sunday, May 19, 2013
It was exactly three days after my article was published when Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace asked Daniel Pfeiffer, Assistant to the President of the United States and Senior Adviser to the President for Strategy and Communications the question about Obama’s activities that night. During the approximate five-minute question and answer session, Mr. Wallace asked Pfeiffer no fewer than eight times where Obama was and what he was doing as events in Benghazi were unfolding.
The following portion of the exchange was excerpted directly from the show video transcriptand illustrates the attempts by Mr. Wallace to get a single, straightforward answer to one simple question (edited for brevity; highlights by this author):
WALLACE: OK. Let’s turn to Benghazi… Question, what did the president do the rest of that night to pursue Benghazi?
WALLACE:But with due respect, you didn’t answer my question. What did the president do that night?
PFEIFFER: He was talking to his national security staff, his National Security Council, the people who keep him up to date about briefings as they happen.
WALLACE: Was he in the Situation Room?
PFEIFFER: He was kept up to date throughout the day.
WALLACE:Do you not know whether he was in the Situation Room?
PFEIFFER: I don’t remember what room the president was in on that night. And that’s a largely irrelevant fact.
WALLACE: Well –
WALLACE: Here’s the point, though. The ambassador goes missing, ends up the first ambassador in more than 30 years is killed. Four Americans, including the ambassador, are killed. Dozens of Americans are in jeopardy. The president at 4:00 in the afternoon says to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs to deploy forces. No forces are deployed. Where is he while all this is going on?
PFEIFFER: This has been testified to by the –
WALLACE: Well, no. No one knows where he was, or how he was involved, or who told him there were no forces –
WALLACE: I just want to know what the answer is.
PFEIFFER: The assertions from Republicans here that somehow the president allowed this to happen or didn’t take action is offensive. It is absolutely an offensive premise. And there’s no evidence to support it.
WALLACE: We are just –I’m simply asking a question. Where was he? What did he do? How did he respond? Who told him that you can’t deploy forces, and what was his response to that?
As illustrated by the transcript, Obama’s assistant and communications advisor refused to answer a simple question.
The question stands unanswered: Where was Barack Hussein Obama, who was he with an exactly what was he doing during the 18 1/2 hours when, as Commander-in-Chief, he was Missing in Action (MIA)?
If Obama has nothing to hide, then produce the White House logs, the visitor logs, the related NSC correspondence, and all documents related to his location and activities during this most critical time period in recent American history.
As I wrote in my original article, “[E]xpose that nugget and I suspect the findings will be far more damaging, far more troubling, and exceedingly more alarming than anyone has begun to imagine. It is this mystical missing period of time where many clues exist.