Wednesday, August 28, 2013


Americans Stand with Israel
by Bee Sting
August 28, 2013

Let :Freedom Ring"!  ... Here is a remarkable commentary by Danny Jeffrey:

FREEDOM RINGS 1776 is a conservative voice, defending the views of those who still believe in the constitution and opposing any and all who would lead us from our tried and true beliefs. We who still believe in the spirit of 1776 must oppose anyone who would set this nation on a course that will fundamentally transform America.
Danny Jeffrey

August 27, 2013
Back when the civil war in Libya was just beginning I was writing of Responsibility To Protect, a Soros sponsored doctrine now commonly known and referred to as R2P. At that time I was warning all who would listen that George Soros, with Obama's assistance had created the 'Arab Spring', which lately I have been referring to that as the 'Islamic Firestorm'. That firestorm is gaining in force and growing more dangerous with each passing day. Along with R2P I brought up the dangers presented by three women in the Obama regime. Samantha Power, now known to many, Susan Rice who has progressed from UN Ambassador to National Security Adviser, and Hillary Clinton, ostensibly being groomed for a Presidential run in 2016.

When the Joint Chiefs of Staff advised Obama to avoid any involvement in Libya as we had nothing to gain from intervening, they were promptly overruled by the three women mentioned above and we enacted R2P to aid in toppling Qaddafi. I wrote at the time that Libya was to simply be a precedent setter that would allow Obama to later enact R2P against Israel when an all out attack by Arab nations began there. See 'The Coming Assault On Israel-Part Two' in Suggested Reading below.

We have all seen and laughed at the photo-shopped images of Obama in a Nazi uniform. Unfortunately those images are a harbinger of things to come, for Obama lifts many pages from the Nazi rule book. 

In 1939 the last thing that the German people wanted was another war. They had lost the First World War and as the result of the Treaty of Versailles Germany was forced to pay reparations due to their part in the war and that cost drove them into bankruptcy, i.e.: the Weimar Republic which led them into runaway hyperinflation. The following image is of a fifty million Mark banknote. In 1923 that was just about enough to buy a loaf of bread.

Obama is taking us down the same path to hyperinflation. He is also taking us down the path to World War Three. What the people wanted and what Hitler wanted were two very different things and yet Hitler had to convince the German populace that war was in their best interests or at least Germany's national honor.

Every dictator needs an enemy of the state on which to blame all problems, and he needs a way to start a war and blame the other nation. Adolf Hitler had the Jews to blame when he came to power, Barrack Obama has the white conservatives. Different dictator, different time, and a different group to blame, but the methods and the goals are still the same.

As for waging war: The Allies realized that they had gone too far in the Treaty of Versailles. Part of the terms were that Germany not rearm. When the rearmament began it was ignored. The Allies did not want to go to war again either. When Hitler's forces entered Czechoslovakia and Austria, that too was ignored, leading Hitler to grow ever more bold, however, Poland was a different story altogether. They had no desire to be annexed, presenting Hitler with the need to start a war and blame it on them, and that is where Operation Canned Goods, or Operation Himmler as it is more commonly called, comes in.

This operation was a false flag strategy to make it look as though Poland had initiated an attack on Germany, thus giving the propaganda ministry cause to launch an invasion of Poland. It is a sad indictment of our elected and appointed leaders but lately we have all been encountering the term 'false flag event' and few have any doubt that these so called leaders are fully capable of stooping so low as to create one.

In October of last year I wrote an essay entitled "Syria-Our Next War". In it I drew attention to the continuing drama of John McCain and Lindsey Graham and how they endeavor to promote a growing American involvement in Middle East affairs and accuse Obama of 'leading from behind'. It is a tried and true method. Obama's role is that of an American Commander in Chief reluctant to employ the great power our nation possesses. Eventually, through 'bipartisanship' he is persuaded and once again we enter the insanity of Islamic nations.

Both McCain and Graham have long called for implementing R2P in Syria and once again Obama appeared reluctant. When it looked as though the Jihadists would prevail there was little need. The entry of Hezbollah's fresh troops proved the turning point and the scales tipped in favor of Assad. Thus Obama's red line came into play. The use of chemical weapons would be a factor that would permit Obama to once again side with Al Qaeda, launch cruise missiles and possibly implement R2P, and worse case scenario, send our military into Syria in support of terrorists.

The recent report of chemical use to attack women and children lack any degree of credulity but that report is regarded to be enough for Obama to once again begin beating the war drums. Obama views the American public to be a group of moronic sheep, and in many cases he is correct, but not all. I still favor logic and reason over executive propaganda and something about the whole story stinks to high heaven.

With Russia and Iran supporting Assad and with the advent of Hezbollah, the battle for Libya has swung in Assad's favor, and he hopes to keep it that way. That dictator does not want the western nations interjecting themselves into Syria's war and so with all of the rhetoric about WMDs he invited the UN to send inspectors to examine the suspected sites. This is where a copy cat version of Hitler's Operation Canned Goods comes into play. It's false flag time folks.

The UN inspectors arrive and suddenly Assad supposedly unleashed a chemical assault on innocent civilians just a few miles from where the inspectors were garrisoned. In Syria life is cheap and a few hundred more dead doesn't make a lot of difference one way or the other unless the occurrence is horrendous enough to give Obama an excuse to attack Assad.

The report did not say that Assad launched a WMD attack on the forces of Al Qaeda. No, according to the story he poisoned innocent children with Sarin gas. That makes absolutely no sense and reeks of a false flag event, especially when you consider that the inspectors driving to the attack site were fired upon by Al Qaeda snipers to prevent them from getting there and discerning the truth.

Now there is a flip side of this story, diametrically opposed to my views and I would be remiss if I failed to include it here. Israel has an elite intel group known as 8200 who have provided information that the chemical attack was indeed perpetrated by the Assad regime.

From The Times Of Israel...
Israeli Intelligence Seen As Central To U.S. Case Against Syria
On Friday, Israel’s Channel 2 reported that the weapons were fired by the 155th Brigade of the 4th Armored Division of the Syrian Army, a division under the command of the Syrian president’s brother, Maher Assad.And:
According to the Focus report Saturday, a squad specializing in wire-tapping within the IDF’s prestigious 8200 intelligence unit intercepted a conversation between high-ranking regime officials regarding the use of chemical agents at the time of the attack.

At the moment an American fleet gathers, armed with cruise missiles to punish Assad for the alleged crime against humanity. Iran has stated that if the U.S. fires on Syria then they will fire on Israel. Assad's spokesman has also announced that if we attack Syria then Israel would become their victim.

One further quote from the above link:
“There would no logic in Assad attacking Israel,” said Inbar on Tuesday. “But remember, we live in a jungle.”

Nothing that is happening in the Middle East is logical. My views posted above are based on logic and there is no logic in Assad attacking his own civilians and children with Sarin gas on the same day that U.N. observers arrive at his invitation. Questioning the integrity of the 8200 report is tantamount to blasphemy, and yet to accept it indicates that absolute insanity is on the loose over there.

Aeschylus told us 2500 years ago that the first casualty of war is the truth. Thus far I have found no reason to dispute his findings.

There is one other possibility; it is called a SNAFU.

From The Algemeiner...
Israelis Official: Severity of Syrian Regime's Chemical Attack was Likely an 'Operational Mistake'

Many years ago there was a news report of a person being killed by a paid hit man. The ironic end of that report was that the assassin went to the wrong address, quite naturally killing the wrong person. The victim's address was on one of those streets that have both east and west addresses. The wrong man died on the wrong side of town.

Equally tragic is that a lot of people are going to die if Obama continues on course with his plan to launch those missiles. In addition to the aforementioned threats to Israel from both Iran and Syria, Russia also warns that there will be 'serious consequences'. Factor in an almost certain reality that there are Hezbollah sleeper cells scattered throughout the U.S. waiting for orders. It could get rather lively here too.

From The Washington Free Beacon...
Syria Strike Due In Days, West Tells Opposition
Western powers told the Syrian opposition to expect a strike against President Bashar al-Assad’s forces within days, according to sources who attended a meeting between envoys and the Syrian National Coalition in Istanbul.

I shall close this essay with the thoughts of my fellow Americans and one thought of my own.

From Reuters...
As Syria War Escalates, Americans Cool To Intervention
About 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the United States should not intervene in Syria's civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.

Interesting numbers. Sixty percent are growing weary of our endless wars and nine percent want us to launch, but the number that bothers me most is thirty-one. That is the percentage of Americans who don't even have an opinion, and yet they vote. Is it any surprise that we are in such dire straits?