Bee's note:  Last night, on 60 Minutes, Obama gave the "green light" to Iran - not to our ally Israel.  The madman of Iran, now sleeping comfortably in a NYC hotel, can rest comfortably, knowing he just heard Obama refer to Israel's concerns of survival, as "noise".  

Most people are aware that "white" noise is used to block out sounds.  For instance, some people sleep with a fan running in order to block out noise from the outside; and here we have a President of the U.S. referring to an American ally's concerns as background noise.

Why should this surprise anyone following Obama's failed foreign policies?

The cries of Ambassador Stevens, while being raped and murdered, must have also been "noise" Obama did not hear.  He slept well, and then traveled to Vegas the following day to campaign.  He and Hillary apologize to the Muslims, by making a $70,000 video to be played in Pakistan, apologizing for another video which supposedly was the root of the Muslim uprisings in Egypt, Libya, Pakistan, Afghanistan and 16 or more other Muslim countries.

Does anyone listen to the anti-American, anti-Israel noise from the Arab/Muslim streets? 

 

Obama has just raised a white flag and surrendered to Islam.  He has trashed America's freedoms, including our Constitution.  He is attempting to silence America's concerns - not just those of PM Netanyahu.

I would not be surprised in the least if the next sound Obama hears is that of Israel responding to Iran's threats.  War is inevitable, just as it was when the Muslims attacked the U.S. on 9/11.

May the "noise" of American voters on November 6th be heard loud and clear and may it be the end of Obama's deliberate destruction of America.

**************************

Obama snubs Netanyahu on Iran: My decisions - only what’s right for America

DEBKAfile Special Report September 24, 2012, 9:24 AM (GMT+02:00)

Obama puts the lid on Iran cooperation with Israel

US President Barack Obama said Sunday night, Sept. 23 on CBS “60 Minutes” that he understands and agrees with Netanyahu’s insistence that Iran not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons as this would threaten both countries, the world in general and kick off an arms race. But he then added: "When it comes to our national security decisions – any pressure that I feel is simply to do what's right for the American people. And I am going to block out – any noise that's out there."

Obama went on to say: “Now I feel an obligation - not pressure but obligation - to make sure that we’re in close consultation with the Israelis on these issues because it affects them deeply.”

So, consultation? yes; cooperation? forget it. His comments removed the last hopes Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak may have entertained of cooperation with the US for curtailing Iran’s nuclear designs by military force.

The US president was crystal clear: By saying he will be ruled solely by American security interests, he showed them that they too were being left to be guided by Israel’s security interests. So forget about red lines for America, he was telling Netanyahu.

His blunt verging-on-contemptuous dismissal of Israel’s concerns as “noise out there” was not much different from the way Iran’s leaders referred to the Jewish state.

Their threats against Israel have different dimensions: On the one hand, they say that if Israel is even thinking of attacking Iran, it will be destroyed in a preemptive attack. On the other, Israel has neither the military capability nor the courage to strike Iran.

Asked on CNN Sunday whether he feared a war with Israel was imminent, Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said: "The Zionists are very much, very adventuresome… They seek to fabricate new opportunities for themselves and their adventurous behaviors."
Obama’ “noises” are Ahmadinejad’s “fabrications.”

The Iranian president had no need to explain how Iran would react, because the answer was broadcast ahead of his arrival in New York to address the UN General Assembly Thursday, by Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the Revolutionary Guards missile section.

The general said Sunday:  Should Israel and Iran engage militarily, "nothing is predictable... and it will turn into World War III" Addressing Iran’s Arab-language network, he said, "In circumstances in which they (the Israelis) have prepared everything for an attack, it is possible that we will make a pre-emptive attack. Any Israeli strike would be presumed to be authorized by the US. Therefore, “we will definitely attackUS bases in Bahrain, Qatar and Afghanistan."

Tehran was therefore pulling against Obama by tying American and Israeli security interests into an inextricable bundle.

DEBKAfile’s Jerusalem sources report that Netanyahu is now seriously considering calling off his trip to New York for a speech to the UN General Assembly scheduled for Thursday, Sept. 27. He realizes that by challenging US policy from the UN platform, he would lay himself open to criticism for gratuitous provocation of the president and interference in America’s election campaign weeks before a presidential election.

Obama’s Republican challenger Mitt Romney, in a separate CBS interview, attacked Obama’s reference to Israel’s legitimate concerns about a nuclear Iran as “noise out there,” calling it “just the latest evidence of his chronic disregard for the security of our closest ally in the Middle East.”

Earlier, Romney termed the president’s decision not to meet Netanyahu as sending a message throughout the Middle East “that we distance ourselves from our friends.”

As DEBKAfile reported after that Obama snub, the wrangling with Washington has reduced Netanyahu’s options to start standing alone and making his own decisions.

Obama’s latest words underline this. The prime minister can no longer avoid his most fateful decision and one that is critical to Israel’s survival: to attack Iran and disrupt its nuclear program or live with an anti-Semitic nuclear Iran dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish state and a threat to world stability.

For two weeks, the Israeli prime minister has dodged and ducked around the White House message. Instead, he has kept on bombarding Washington with high-powered messengers. They all came back with the same tidings: the US President is not only fed up with Israeli pressure but more determined than evade any military engagement with Iran.




  

Will Obama succeed in creating a United States of Islam in the Middle East?

FOX NEWSBy Dinesh D'Souza
September 21, 2012

Something very big is going on in the Middle East. This is not about an inflammatory film or a political assassination in Libya. Rather, recent events confirm that throughout the Muslim world, radical Islam is on the march. The radical Muslims have figured out a much better strategy than the Al Qaeda strategy of the past decade. Instead of terrorist acts aimed at directly wounding the “far enemy,” namely the United States, Islamic radicals are using democracy and public protest to defeat the “near enemy,” namely their own autocratic governments, and seize power.  Remarkably President Obama seems to be responding in a way that helps the Islamic radicals, and the vital question is why.

To understand Obama, we need to back up and observe his Middle East policy since he took office in early 2009. There is a weird double standard in the way that President Obama has been acting in region. In Libya, he used force to prevent "genocide" but he has refused to use force to prevent much greater genocide in Syria. What makes Obama's conduct especially odd is that he undertook Libyan military intervention after a civil struggle in which Muammar Qaddafi had killed around 250 people.  In Syria, however, tens of thousands have been killed by the regime and still Obama refuses to use direct military force.  

A similar inconsistency defines Obama's actions in Egypt and Iran. In Egypt, Obama used diplomatic pressure to oust the Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak, clearing the way for the Islamic radicals, led by the Muslim Brotherhood, to win the subsequent parliamentary and presidential elections. Using the rhetoric of democracy, Obama allied himself in Egypt with the democracy protesters. Yet when there were equally massive demonstrations in Iran a year and a half earlier, aimed at ousting the regime of the mullahs, Obama urged caution and restraint.  He refused to embrace the protesters. Essentially he did nothing. Eventually the Iranian police crushed the uprising and the Iranian rebellion dissolved.

So we have a dual anomaly here. How can we explain why Obama uses force here but not there, getting rid of one ruler but keeping others in place? Even now Obama's conduct in response to the latest Muslim agitation is ambiguous. Far from standing up forthrightly for American interests, Obama seems equally resolute in protecting the reputation of the Islamic agitators and their newly-installed leaders.

To date, the best attempt to account for Obama's strange conduct is Walter Russell Mead's theory that Obama is "the least competent manager of America's Middle East diplomatic portfolio."  In other words, Obama is an amateur and a bungler. Mead notes that "he has committed our forces in the strategically irrelevant backwater of Libya," that he has "strained our ties with the established regimes without winning new friends on the Arab street" and that he has "infuriated and frustrated long-term friends but made no headway in reconciling enemies."

But surely Obama knows that Libya is strategically irrelevant; surely he can see that he is antagonizing America's friends and strengthening America's enemies. So Mead's analysis begs the question: why would Obama continue to act this way when the results are as obvious to him as to Mead and the rest of us?

I believe I can answer these questions and explain Obama's double standards.  The key is to realize that Obama isn't a fool.  He isn't getting results opposite to the ones he intends; rather, he intends the results he's getting.  He said during his inaugural speech that he wanted to remake America and transform its place in the world, and this is exactly what he is doing.

Obama's is an anti-colonialist, an ideology he adopted from his Kenyan father.  Recall that Obama's autobiography is titled "Dreams From My Father."  In that book, Obama details how he got his aspirations, his values, even his core identity, from his absentee father.  In a sample passage, Obama writes, "It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself."  

While anti-colonialism may be an unfamiliar word to many Americans, it is a very popular ideology even today in Asia, Africa, South America, and the Middle East. Anti-colonialism is the doctrine that holds that America and the West are the rogue nations of the world. Having adopted his father's anti-colonial way of thinking, President Obama has oriented his foreign policy not so much toward containing Iran or North Korea but rather toward containing America.  

I'm not suggesting Obama is a traitor, that he hates America, or that he's anti-American.  Rather, he subscribes to an ideology that considers it a good thing for America's influence to be reduced. Obama wants to reduce America's footprint in the world because he believes we have been stepping on the world.

How is Obama doing this?  Two dictators are out--Qaddafi and Mubarak--and two dictatorial regimes--that of Assad in Syria and the mullahs in Iran--remain in power. What do Qaddafi and Mubarak have in common?  They were both doing business with America.  Mubarak was America's most reliable ally in the region, not counting Israel. Qaddafi was not exactly an ally, but he had been behaving himself since America's Iraq invasion, outing terrorists, paying reparations for the Lockerbie bombing, and so on.  

Now both Qaddafi and Mubarak are gone. 

In Libya, it's hard to say what the new regime will do. We have heard both Islamist rumblings and secular rumblings, and now the Islamic rumblings are getting louder. But undeniably in Egypt, we are seeing the consolidation of a regime that is vastly more anti-American and anti-Israel.  

It's important to realize that in Egypt Obama is actively facilitating the rise to power of the Muslim Brotherhood.  No one is suggesting that Obama caused the Arab Spring. The Brotherhood won a free election. But now there is a power struggle under way between the Brotherhood and the Egyptian military.  As a recent AP story reported, the Obama administration has been warning the military: step aside and turn over power to the Brotherhood, or America will cut off military and economic aid.  

This could be explained as reflecting Obama's unshakeable commitment to democracy, but this commitment was absent during the massive popular demonstrations in Iran in 2009. Then Obama stayed out, even praising the reaction of the Iranian Supreme Leader, and eventually the democracy movement was crushed. Similarly in Syria, Obama has shown himself clearly reluctant to get involved, providing only modest support to the rebels even in the wake of a massive military crackdown and tens of thousands of casualties.

So Assad continues to hang on, and the mullahs remain secure in power in Iran. What do these regimes have in common?  They are both hostile to the United States, and allied with each other in subverting America's interests in the region. Both are also state sponsors of terrorism. If the regimes in Syria and Iran were to fall, we can't be sure what would replace them, but we can be reasonably confident that the new governments would be less hostile to America than the ones that are there now.

Thus Obama's double-standards in the region can be explained by an underlying single-standard.  He wants to undermine America's allies and leave in place regimes that are indifferent or hostile to America.  This is what the anti-colonial ideology predicts he would do, and this is what his actions show he is doing.  No wonder that in recent days Obama seems more concerned with containing America than with acting decisively against the hostile forces of radical Islam in the Middle East.

Now what?  If Obama gets a second term, what might be the next pro-American regime to fall?  In my view, Saudi Arabia. If Obama is re-elected he could demand that the Saudi royal family put itself on the ballot against the Muslim Brotherhood. That is an election the Saudi royals would most likely lose. If that happens then the three most important countries in the Middle East (Iran, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia) would all be in the grip of the radical Muslims.  

We are seeing in the region a powerful bid for the restoration of Islam as a global power. One Muslim Brotherhood official put it bluntly.  What the radical Muslims seek, he said, is "a country called the United States of Islam."  Remarkably this radical Muslim dream going back to the 1920s is now being advanced by President Obama, who seems to think it is somehow consonant with the dream from his father.

Just as history will credit Ronald Reagan with helping to produce the dissolution of the Soviet empire, history might credit Obama with helping to produce the United States of Islam.

Dinesh D'Souza, narrator and co-director of the film "2016: Obama's America," is the author of the bestselling new book "Obama's America: Unmaking the American Dream." For more visit www.DineshDSouza.com.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/21/will-obama-succeed-in-creating-united-states-islam-in-middle-east/#ixzz27PZCnUpJ

Obama Will Apologize for Prophet Film Before the Marxist U.N.

INDEPENDENT SENTINEL

September 22, 2012

By Sara Noble

One might have expected our president to stand up for our free speech and for the U.S. citizen who made a moronic film within the parameters of free speech, especially when radicals called for the death of the filmmaker.

Egyptian President and Theocrat, Mohammed Morsi, called for the arrest of U.S. citizens, including the filmmaker and a pastor who stuck up for him. Still no support for our constitutional rights from President Obama, only apologies.

Worse yet, President Obama took the unprecedented step of purchasing air time on Pakistani TV to apologize for the film which precipitated riots throughout Pakistan. In fact, our “allies” in the Pakistani government gave people the day off, calling it a holiday in support of The Prophet.

The riots did not deter President Obama. His reaction has grown more preposterous and do not reflect the reasonable reactions of a president of a free nation.

Now he is going to the Marxist U.N. to apologize and denounce the filmmaker again.

When President Obama told Medvedev that he can do more after his last election because he will “have more flexibility,”  what did you think he meant? He is telling this to a communist who will relay it to a communist dictator, keeping it, he thought, from the American people. Can you imagine what we haven’t heard?

This president is going to go to a Marxist organization which includes countries like Iran and Cuba, and he is going to apologize for our free speech. Furthermore, he is serving as judge, jury, and executioner of the filmmaker without giving him the benefit of due process or a trial. He is putting the man’s life in further danger.

This will send a chilling effect on our first amendment which is the president’s intention. He is not a stupid man.

Check out the Politico piece alerting us to the text of Obama’s U.N. speech:

via Politico [Emboldened phrase is my doing]

National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor previews the president’s speech to the UN General Assembly next week:

“UNGA always provides an opportunity for the President to put the international situation in context, and to put forward a vision of US leadership. I would certainly expect the President to address the recent unrest in the Muslim world, and the broader context of the democratic transitions in the Arab World.”

More after the jump:

“As he has in recent days, the President will make it clear that we reject the views in this video, while also underscoring that violence is never acceptable – a message that has been echoed by the leaders he has personally reached out to in places like Libya, Egypt and Yemen. He will also send a clear message that the United States will never retreat from the world; will bring justice to those who harm Americans; and will stand strongly for our democratic values abroad.

President Obama is going to build on his lies by framing the worldwide anti-American riots as a transition phase.

During the speech, President Obama is going to further his false narrative that Al-Qaeda is defeated. The media is not reporting on many of the riots taking place throughout the world. The media is lying and saying that the riots are mostly peaceful protests and that there aren’t many involved. None of that is true. Mainstream media has been corrupted and Obama’s failed foreign policy is being propped up by their deceits.

Obama will say Iran will not be allowed to get the bomb when in fact he is doing nothing to stop them. He won’t even meet with Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Does anyone doubt that Obama will release the Blind Sheikh after the election?

OBAMA TO RELEASE ONE THIRD OF GITMO INMATES

by AWR HAWKINS 22 Sep 2012  - BIG PEACE-BREITBART

Did former Gitmo prisoner plan raid?

President Barack Obama is about to release or transfer 55 Gitmo prisoners, despite reports that the Libyan believed to be behind the killing of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was a former Guantanamo inmate transferred to Libyan custody.

The large percentage of those scheduled to be released are Yemeni, according to a list made public by the Obama administration.

Obama stopped the release or transfer of Yemeni inmates in 2010, because the conditions in the country were viewed as too "unsettled" at the time. 

A release or transfer of 55 inmates means Obama is moving out one third of the prisoners at Guantanamo. And while it doesn't represent a shutdown of the facility, it's certainly indicative of a move toward that end. 

Could it be that Obama is trying to set himself up to campaign as the man who is taking steps to finally close Gitmo, just as he recently reversed the Afghanistan surge in order to campaign as the man who's winding down the war in the Afghanistan? 

The ACLU has praised the releases as "a partial victory for transparency."

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/09/22/Obama-to-Release-One-Third-of-Gitmo-Inmates

US policy toward Israel in a second Obama term

 ISRAEL MATZAV
by Carl in Jerusalem

Shoula Romano Horing attempts to extrapolate from the changes to the Democratic party's 2012 platform - as compared with its platforms in 2008 and 2004 - what a second Obama term (God forbid) might look like to Israel. It's not pretty (Hat Tip: Dan F).  

Obama’s agenda concerning Israel during a second term will likely include the following:

Obama will try to divide Jerusalem and recognize a Palestinian state with its capital in east Jerusalem. The 2008 and 2004 Democratic Party platforms declared "Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel…It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths." The original 2012 platform in which Jerusalem was unmentioned is consistent with Obama’s May, 2011 speech and with the recent State Department and White House spokespeople’s refusal to acknowledge under intense questioning by reporters that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

Obama will demand from Israel a complete and a full return to the 1949 armistice lines, which excludes from Israel east Jerusalem and the West Bank hills which look down at the country’s international airport and 80% of its the population.The 2008 DNC platform stated "All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949." This pro- Israel section does not exist in the 2012 platform.

Obama will demand the return of Palestinian refugees into Israel, not just to a future Palestinian state. Both the 2004 and 2008 platforms stated: "The creation of a Palestinian state should resolve the issue of Palestinian refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel." The 2012 platform does not contain such language.

Obama will recognize Hamas, the terrorist organization which currently controls the Gaza Strip, and will begin negotiations with them, despite the fact that Hamas will never recognize Israel’s right to exist and supports and sponsors terrorism. The 2008 DNC platform declared, "The United States and its Quartet partners should continue to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right to exist, and abides by past agreements." This language is gone from the 2012 platform.

American military cooperation with Israel will be reduced. The 2008 platform, for example, spoke of a "commitment which requires us to ensure that Israel retains a qualitative edge for its national security and its right to self-defense." The 2012 platform mentions only that "(the) administration has also worked to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region," with no commitment to doing so in the future.

But most American Jews will still vote for Obama, because he favors unrestricted abortions at government expense. /sigh.

What could go wrong?

posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 1:45 PM

Washington’s Iran war game vs. real Iranian, Israeli war preparations

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis September 22, 2012, 11:01 AM (GMT+02:00)

Ehud Barak and Rahm Emanuel in Chicago

Ill-assorted figures this week cited 2013 as the year in which the United States was expected to go to war on Iran. Among them was Iran’s atomic commission director Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani, former US ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk, and players in the US-Iranian war game staged at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington, whose heads are close to US President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

This apparent US-Iranian concord was unusual but not fortuitous, say DEBKAfile analysts.

On the part of Washington, it had a distinct purpose, which was to demonstrate to Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu that an Israeli attack before the US presidential election would be superfluous.

The message was played out in the Saban institute’s war game: The player representing Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the Americans are tired of the fight and they are led by a weak man with no stomach for the struggle.
The script then proves him wrong: On July 6, 2013, Iranian agents coming in from Venezuela blow up a hotel on the Caribbean island of Aruba killing 137 people, many of them American holidaymakers including nuclear physicists. It was clearly a revenge attack for the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists.

The next chapter of this scenario had President Obama, portrayed as reelected in November, ordering Iranian Revolutionary Guards headquarters in eastern Iran to be bombed, 40 Iranian security installations shut down by cyber warfare and Tehran warned that US intelligence had the names of Iranian agents in 38 countries and their lives were at risk.

Iran purportedly responds by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, through which the world receives a third of its oil. The players representing the US government then slap down a 24-hour ultimatum for Iran to halt its nuclear program or else face the destruction of all its facilities, along with the entire Iranian military deployment in the Persian Gulf.
Tehran fails to comply and the US and Iran are at war.

This scenario implicitly made the point that since the US election was only weeks off and America would most likely go to war with Iran next year anyway, Israel had no need to jump the gun before November, 2012.

This was most likely the answer Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak received too when he met with Chicago Mayor and Obama’s former chief of staff Rahm Emanuel for lunch at City Hall Thursday, Sept. 20.

The only known result of their conversation was a gift by the mayor to the minister of a six-pack of Chicago’s famous Goose Island 312 beer. Whether Barak shared it with Netanyahu and whether the beer was to their taste was not revealed.

Apart from this message, the Saban Institute war game notably hinged on two basic premises while skipping a third.

The first was that American and Iranian leaders both acted on wrong strategic and intelligence assessments of the other’s intentions and therefore miscalculated each other’s responses. Had they realized this, the war might have been avoided.

A second working assumption was that Iran had scattered half of its stocked enriched uranium in dozens of places across the country to reduce their vulnerability to attack, while keeping the other half in one place. This was taken to signal qualified Iranian willingness for a diplomatic resolution of its controversy with the United States.

Where the Saban war game erred was in leaving the Syrian factor out of the equation.
DEBKAfile’s military sources point out that Syrian President Bashar Assad is using the same strategy as Iran for his chemical and biological arsenal. Half has been distributed and placed in the care of an estimated 20 Syrian army units; the other half reposes at fixed storage sites – a device indicating to Washington and Moscow that he is open to negotiating an end to the war before deciding to loose his weapons of mass destruction against Syrian rebels.

The Washington think tank’s war game fails to take into account that Iranian and Syrian steps are so closely synchronized that Syrian already looms large as the most likely venue for the approaching core event of a conflict pitting the US and Israel against Iran. Syria and Iran have become almost interchangeable against their shared foes.

Elite units of Iran’s al Qods, the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) external arm, are being airlifted into Syria and Lebanon, as the IRGC chief Gen. Ali Jafari, disclosed Sunday, Sept. 16. I

Iranian troops are now deployed on Israel’s northern and eastern borders.

Israel responded Wednesday, Sept. 19, with a snap military exercise, the largest the IDF has staged in many years, on its borders with Syria and Lebanon.

Not all the Israeli units taking part in the drill returned to home basewhen the drill was over. Substantial military strength, estimated at two divisions, is therefore building up and facing the Iranian troops across the border in Syria and Lebanon.

Indeed, that same Wednesday saw more than one telling event in the same incendiary context:  Iran’s foreign minister Ali Akbar Salehi paid an unscheduled visit to Damascus for talks with Assad on his way home from a meeting in Cairo with Egyptian, Turkish and Iraqi foreign ministers. They gathered on the initiative of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi for another go at resolving the Syrian disaster. Saudi Arabia which is deeply committed to backing the rebels was pointedly absent.
Iran played ball with Egypt for the purpose of lining up its diplomatic ducks for the war to come by putting together a potential Muslim bloc to stand against the US-Israel-Arab grouping. Tehran is looking ahead to the inevitable propsect of peace negotiations taking off amid the fury of war - or as soon as it ends.

Shortly after the Israeli drill, US intelligence officials accused Iran of “secretly transporting large quantities of weapons and military personnel, almost daily, under the cover of civilian aircraft – via Iraqi airspace – to aid embattled Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.”

The accent on “almost daily” confirmed that a major buildup of Iranian military strength is in progress in Syria. Typically, Iran is disguising its actions by using civilian aircraft.

IN LESS THAN 2 HOURS, WORLDWIDE JEWISH PRAYER FOR PEACE WITH MASHIACH (SEPT 23)

Countdown to Moshiach: Worldwide Jewish Prayer 

at 11 a.m. EDT

Jews around the world will simultaneously be part of a unique worldwide Jewish Prayer for Peace and Moshiach 

at 5 p.m. Sunday, 11 a.m. EDT.

AAFont Size

By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

First Publish: 9/23/2012, 2:35 PM

Israel National News

Prayers at Western Wall (Kotel)

Israel news photo: Flash 90

Jews around the world will simultaneous be part of a unique worldwide Jewish Prayer for Peace and Moshiach, the Jewish term for the Savior, at 5 p.m. Sunday, 11 a.m. EDT, three days before Yom Kippur.
The idea for Jews to pray together at the same moment is to add power to the prayer to G-d to bring the Moshiach and peace to Jews and to all of the world, explained rabbis.

The event will take place in California at 8 a.m., in London at 4 p.m., Paris at 5 p.m., and in Australia at 1 a.m. Monday morning.


Rabbi Lazer Brody will join Tamar Yonah on her live show on Arutz Sheva shortly before 5 p.m. Israeli time to talk about the prayer and then recite it simultaneously with Tamar, listeners and tens of thousands of Jews around the world.

A YouTube video explaining the day has been viewed more than 90,000 times. It shows Jews all around the world planning for the day and making sure to set asidemoney for charity.
Under the headline of “All Jews As One,” organizers said, “This unique event in Jewish history has been sponsored by motivated Jewish people with help and blessings of rabbis around the world of all affiliations -- Ashkenazim, Sephardim, Chassidim -- with a strong desire that all Jews will be united at the same instant, observant or not, whatever beliefs, affiliation, age, nationality to end all suffering and to welcome the revelation of Hashem's (G-d) Name.”

Bee's note:

See Kotel - cam: (does not work on Google/pls. use Internet Explorer

http://neverbesilent.org/en/live-webcam-kotel-western-wall/

http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/livekotel/newkotelcam/virtualjerusalem/index.php?affid=18

Obummer to denounce Free Speech at the U.N.

Bee's note:  Visions of the horrific murder of Ambassador Stevens remain in my mind as the Muslims rioted in the streets these past weeks, burned the American flag, and attempted to topple American embassies.  Meanwhile, the Obama administration paid $70,000 in an ad played in Pakistan to appease these Muslims.  Pakistan, of all places!  Pakistan, the country that hid bin-Laden for over 5 years!  Pakistan, the Muslim country murdering Christians!  Pakistan, the country that has received BILLIONS of DOLLARS in U.S. "aid".  This aid condemned America's free speech, so why should I doubt that Obama would again repeat his apology in front of the United Nations on Tuesday?  

With every apology Obama makes for our great country, he shames all Americans.  He undermines our Constitution and the troops who have fought for our freedoms before and after September 11,2001.  This will be Obama's legacy - that of an appeaser to savages who all have the blood on their hands of Americans.

I will go so far as to say that Obama has become the brute savage he appeases.  He stands with them, has played the fool these past 4 years, and in the process has made America less safe.

I have just reviewed the topics that will be debated on October 3 between Romney and Obama - none include foreign policy.  Why?!  The destruction of America without, and the economy issues within, are all part of the complete package by this administration.  

KUFFAR NEWS

content.usatoday.com - September 22, 9:28 PM

 Rescoop

Obummer to denounce Free Speech at the U.N.

-------

There is only one legitimate American response to the rampaging Muslims and Blasphemy Riots. That is to explain the double-sided coin of Freedom, state in no uncertain terms Americans do not apologize for Free Speech, vow to defend Freedom with every last bit of awe-inspiring force at America's disposal, and tell Muslims to quit acting like the barbarian portrayed in Innocence of Muslims (a likeness of Muhammad they dispute with their mouths, but mimic with their actions). 

Unfortunately, Obummer bears no resemblance to an American. The world will not hear words like those above coming from America. Instead, Obummer plans to continue his fruitless campaign to appease the marauding Muhammadans by denouncing the exercise of Free Speech and attaching his lips to every Muslim butt his mouth can reach. 

-------

(USA Today) President Obama will address "the recent unrest in the Muslim world" in his speech Tuesday to the United Nations General Assembly, the White House is saying.

That includes denouncing both the protests at American diplomatic posts in the Middle East -- including the death of the U.S. ambassador to Libya -- and the anti-Islam film that is inspiring some of the protests.
 

"As he has in recent days, the President will make it clear that we reject the views in this video, while also underscoring that violence is never acceptable," said National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor in a memo on Obama's upcoming U.N. speech. continue reading

(h/t Weasel Zippers)

 -------

Related 
 

• Bill Clinton to host Islamist President of Egypt
• Muslims hit the streets, clerics call for murder 
• Love for the Prophet: 10s of 1000s riot, more than a dozen die
• The imaginary debate over Free Speech 
• Blasphemy Riots: Thursday's riots and protests 
• U.N. Chief says filmmaker not protected by free expression
• War on Free Speech: Jay Carney slams Mo cartoon
• (Video) France to close embassies & schools over cartoon
• Pakistan declares national holiday for Blasphemy Riots
• Germany wrestles with ban on anti-Islam film screening
• Terry Jones & others referred to criminal court
• Insanity Continues: Fresh Afghan Protest
• Turkish PM to argue for intl. blasphemy laws at UN
• Egyptian PM: U.S. should pass laws against insulting Islam
• Anti-Islam Film Protests Continue in Asia
• 12 dead in 'revenge attack' in Afghanistan
• Egyptian Amb: "Litigation action" against movie continues
• (Video) Michele Bachmann on OIC & blasphemy laws
• Senator: Protests are 'wake-up call' to Australians in denial
• Hezbollah supporters to protest against anti-Islam film
• Muslims Gone Wild: Blasphemy Riots Slideshow
• Australia: Girl, 8, calls on Islamic youth to back jihad
• Police Gas Muslim Protesters in Sydney
• Report: U.S. preps for extended Muslim protests
• Al-Azhar sheikh demands international blasphemy law
• Anti-American violence expands
• Police question anti-Islam Film-Maker
• The Sharia-zation of Hollywood
• Anti-Islam film protests reaches London
• US Embassy calls out Muslim Brotherhood on Twitter
• U.S. Embassy Condemns Hurting Muslims' feelings
• (Video) Blasphemy laws coming to America

 
Fatwa On Islam